编造、故意传播虚假信息罪研究

发布时间：2018-04-26 00:05

本文选题：编造传播 + 虚假信息　；参考：《河北师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：进入21世纪以来,互联网的迅速发展带动了一大批新兴产业的出现,互联网已经触及到我们生活的方方面面,信息传播速度的加快、范围的扩大将人们的生活逐渐变得越来越透明,我们的生活也随着互联网的出现而变得更加便利。据统计,我国网民达到了 6. 8亿,互联网普及率达到了 60%以上,可想而知,互联网对人们的生活影响巨大。与此同时,一些人利用互联网实施侮辱诽谤他人行为,严重扰乱社会秩序,侵犯他人合法权益,造成了严重危害社会的后果。为了维护公民的合法权益和良好的社会秩序,2013年9月9日最高人民法院、最高人民检察院出台了《关于办理利用信息网络实施诽谤等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》,明确将所有在网络上编造、传播虚假信息的行为依照寻衅滋事罪的规定定罪处罚。该解释的出台,为司法机关打击网络编造、传播虚假信息行为提供了统一的法律标尺,但却也引起了刑法理论界的争议,部分学者对该解释的合理性甚至合法性都提出了很大质疑。为此,2015年8月,全国人民代表大会常务委员会通过了《刑法修正案(九)》,将在信息网络或其他媒体上编造、故意传播虚假的险情、疫情、警情、灾情信息的行为新设编造、故意传播虚假信息罪予以规制。《刑法修正案(九)》中的编造、故意传播虚假信息罪是刚刚确定的罪名,我国关于编造、故意传播虚假信息罪的研究也基本上处于比较浅显的状态,本文将以上述司法解释和刑法修正案的具体规定为出发点,对编造、故意传播虚假信息罪的概念进行解读,结合司法实务界的相关案例,对编造、故意传播虚假信息罪以及寻衅滋事罪的犯罪构成要件进行了深入分析,并对该罪在实践当中存在的问题进行分析,提出了进一步完善编造、故意传播虚假信息罪合理建议,以期对司法实践能够有所帮助。本论文共分四个部分:引言部分主要介绍了选题的背景及意义、研究现状、研究方法、创新点与不足。第一部分,编造、故意传播虚假信息罪概述。首先,对编造故意传播虚假信息罪的立法进程进行了回顾,以及《刑法修正案(九)》在审议过程中所遇到的问题,其次,对该罪的特征、类型进行分析,再次,根据已有案件对编造故意传播虚假信息的危害进行分析,最后,对于设立该罪的必要性进行了阐述。第二部分,编造、故意传播虚假信息犯罪的犯罪构成。首先,分析了该罪犯罪构成中的客体;其次,对本罪客观方面中“编造”和“传播”行为进行了分析,阐述了二者之间的关系,区分了二者关系存在的三种不同的类型,并对“虚假的险情、灾情、疫情、警情”进行了认定,分析了编造、故意传播虚假信息罪传播的媒介;第三,对该罪的主体主观方面进行分析,明确了成立该罪的主观方面为直接故意,但该罪不属于目的犯,并说明了理由。第三部分,编造、传播虚假信息罪的认定。首先,分析了编造、故意传播虚假信息行为和行使言论自由的界限。其次,对理论界热议的寻衅滋事罪与本罪进行了比较分析。第三,对本罪与编造、传播虚假恐怖信息罪、敲诈勒索罪进行比较,明确司法实践对该罪定罪标准的把握。第四部分,编造、故意传播虚假信息罪的完善措施。首先,刑法与其他法律的衔接,由于该罪是在信息技术发达的时代背景下制定,因此,解决好与之前相关法律的衔接问题十分重要。其次,罪名设置的问题,编造、故意传播虚假信息罪应是选择性罪名,所以行人的行为无论是触犯了哪一个罪名,该罪都应该成立。再次,讨论了罪数问题的适用。最后,对刑法关于规制编造、故意传播虚假信息罪进行再思考。
[Abstract]:Since the twenty-first Century, the rapid development of the Internet has led to the emergence of a large number of new industries. The Internet has touched all aspects of our life. The speed of information dissemination is speeding up, and the expansion of the scope has gradually become more and more transparent, and our life has become more convenient with the emergence of the Internet. Internet users in China have reached 680 million and the Internet popularity has reached more than 60%. It is conceivable that the Internet has a great impact on people's lives. At the same time, some people use the Internet to insult and defamed others' behavior, seriously disrupt the social order, infringe the legitimate rights and interests of others, and cause serious harm to the society. In order to safeguard citizens The legal rights and interests and good social order, the Supreme People's court in September 9, 2013, the Supreme People's Procuratorate promulgated the interpretation of several issues concerning the application of law in criminal cases such as the use of information network for defamation of defamation and other criminal cases, and clearly made up all the acts on the network and disseminating false information in accordance with the provisions of the crime of provocation. The introduction of this interpretation provides a unified legal ruler for the judicial organs to combat network fabrication and disseminate false information, but it has also caused controversy in the theoretical circles of the criminal law. Some scholars have questioned the reasonableness and even legality of the interpretation. In August 2015, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress passed the "penalty". The law amendment (nine) > will be made up in the information network or other media, intentionally disseminating false danger, epidemic situation, police situation, the behavior of the information of the disaster situation, the crime of deliberately spreading false information to be regulated. < criminal law amendment (nine) >), the crime of deliberately spreading false information is a newly established crime, and our country is about to make up and deliberately spread the false information. The research on the crime of false information is also basically in a comparatively shallow state. This article will take the above-mentioned judicial interpretation and the specific provisions of the criminal law amendment as the starting point, interpret the concept of the crime of fabricating and deliberately disseminating false information, and combine the relevant cases of the judicial practice to make up, disseminate the crime of false information and commit the offense of provocation. The constitutive requirements of the crime are analyzed in depth, and the problems existing in the crime are analyzed, and the reasonable suggestions are put forward to further perfect the creation and intentionally disseminate false information, so as to help the judicial practice. This paper is divided into four parts: the introduction part mainly introduces the background and significance of the topic, research status and research. The first part is a review of the legislative process of making the crime of deliberately disseminating false information, and the problems encountered in the process of the revision of the criminal law amendment (nine). Secondly, the characteristics and types of the crime are analyzed, and again, according to the existing cases. To make an analysis of the harm of deliberately spreading false information. Finally, the necessity of establishing the crime is expounded. The second part, making up, intentionally disseminating the criminal constitution of false information crime. First, the object of the crime is analyzed. Secondly, the analysis of the "fabricating" and "spreading" in the objective aspect of the crime is analyzed. This paper describes the relationship between the two, distinguishes three different types of the relationship between the two, and identifies the "false danger, the disaster, the epidemic situation, the police situation", and analyzes the media for the dissemination of the crime of falsely disseminating the crime of false information. Third, the subjective aspects of the crime are analyzed, and the subjective aspects of the crime are clearly defined as direct. Intentional, but this crime does not belong to the purpose offense, and explains the reason. The third part, the crime of fabricating and disseminating false information. First, it analyses the limits of making up, deliberately spreading false information and exercising the freedom of speech. Secondly, a comparative analysis is made to the crime of provocation and the crime of provocation in the theoretical circles. Third, the crime and the creation and the spread of the crime are spread. The crime of false terrorist information, the crime of extortion is compared, and the judicial practice is clear about the conviction standard of the crime. The fourth part is the perfect measure for the crime of deliberately spreading false information. First, the connection between the criminal law and other laws, because the crime is formulated in the background of the advanced information technology, therefore, the relevant laws are solved well. The problem of cohesion is very important. Secondly, the crime of setting up a crime, making up the crime of deliberately spreading false information should be a selective crime, so that the behavior of pedestrians should be established no matter which crime is offended. Again, the application of the number of crimes is discussed. Finally, the criminal law is Rethought on the crime of regulating and making the false information. Exam.

【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】