论我国刑法过失中的预见

发布时间：2018-04-26 01:00

本文选题：犯罪过失 + 预见　；参考：《沈阳师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：犯罪过失是过失犯罪成立的主观要素,代表着行为人的主观恶性程度。行为主体是否具有预见的能力,预见的对象是否正确,预见的程度是否符合标准,这些主观因素都会对过失犯罪的成立产生一定的影响。研究犯罪过失中的预见不但是为了相关刑法理论的研究奠定基础,也是为了可以更加便捷、高效的解决司法实践中与预见有关的问题。我国对过失犯罪中“预见”二字的含义无论是从刑法理论层面亦或是立法层面都未予阐明。所以本文首先需要界定预见的基本概念、明确预见的根本内涵,以此作为论文理论研究的基础。同时通过对预见的不同分类进行梳理,是对预见内含再进行概括性的解读,准确、熟练地掌握与预见有关的基础性知识。预见的各个构成要素的错误认识是导致行为人作出错误预判的根本原因,行为人是受到其中某一要素或某几个要素的影响,不能正确的推断出事件发展的趋势和结果。对预见的判断实质是对行为人主观心理的解读,这种心理活动本身就带有专属性、隐秘性的特点,所以对预见的判断也就成为了司法实践工作中的难点。本文主要采取比较分析法、归纳总结法以及实证研究法.对“预见”先进行基础性的归纳梳理,拆析论文题目,从预见对象、预见程度、预见能力、预见时间四个方面介绍过失中的预见,之后再去讨论如何判断预见。并创新性的将预见的各构成要素之间确立了一定的逻辑顺序,即预见时间——预见能力——预见程度——预见对象。科学化的认定过失犯罪的主观问题,有利于确保认定结果的正确性,避免冤假错案的出现,保障法律的公平性。分节讨论、详细梳理,力争深化对预见的理解,解决司法实践中的相关难题。
[Abstract]:Criminal negligence is the subjective element of the establishment of negligent crime, representing the subjective malignancy of the perpetrator. Whether the subject has the ability to foresee, whether the object of foresight is correct, and whether the degree of foresight meets the standard, these subjective factors will have a certain impact on the establishment of negligent crime. The research on the foresight of criminal negligence is not only to lay a foundation for the study of relevant criminal law theory, but also to solve the problems related to foresight in judicial practice more conveniently and efficiently. The meaning of "foresight" in negligent crime in our country has not been clarified either from the theory of criminal law or from the legislative level. Therefore, this paper first needs to define the basic concept of foresight and define the basic connotation of foresight, which is the basis of theoretical research in this paper. At the same time, by sorting out the different classification of foresight, it is a general interpretation of the connotation of foresight, which can accurately and skillfully grasp the basic knowledge related to foresight. The misconception of each component element of foresight is the fundamental reason that leads the actor to make the wrong prejudgment. The actor is influenced by one element or several of them, and can not infer the trend and result of the event development correctly. The essence of the judgment of foresight is the interpretation of the subjective psychology of the doer, and the psychological activity itself has the characteristics of specificity and secrecy, so the judgment of foresight has become a difficult point in judicial practice. This article mainly adopts the comparative analysis method, the induction summary method and the empirical research method. This paper introduces the foresight in fault from four aspects: the object of foresight, the degree of foresight, the ability of foresight and the time of foresight, and then discusses how to judge foresight. The author creatively establishes a certain logical order between the elements of foresight, that is, the time of foresight, the ability of foresight, the degree of foresight, and the object of foresight. Scientific identification of subjective problems of negligent crime is conducive to ensuring the correctness of the findings, avoiding the appearance of unjust cases, and ensuring the fairness of the law. The section discusses, combs in detail, strives to deepen the understanding to the foresight, solves the related difficult problem in the judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】