共犯竞合类型化研究

发布时间：2018-04-28 16:27

本文选题：共犯竞合 + 分工分类法　；参考：《郑州大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：共犯竞合属于共同犯罪中一种较为特殊的类型,德日等国对共犯竞合的理论探讨较多,但目前中国刑法理论界对共犯竞合的研究不全面,具体表现在对其具体含义表述模糊、竞合产生原因、处理方法等方面,均存在一定的不足,但司法实践中存在共犯竞合现象,理论研究的缺乏,导致了实践中法律适用的困难。本文引言部分主要是阐述本文论题的意义,同时简要介绍共犯竞合问题产生的原因,接着指出了目前德国和日本以及中国部分学者对于共犯竞合问题的研究状况,最后对论文结构安排进行了说明。本文除引言外主要包括四个部分:第一部分是对共犯竞合的概念、产生根源的探讨。首先阐述了共犯竞合产生的根源是由于共同犯罪人分工分类理论,正是由于分工分类方法的出现,实践中便会产生一人兼具多个共犯形态的情况出现。同时,共犯竞合具有同一主体实施、多个异质行为竞合、多行为存在于同一犯罪构成等特点。共犯竞合作为竞合犯罪的一种,与法条竞合及想象竞合存在较大不同。第二部分对共犯竞合现象产生的过程进行了分析,在共同犯罪人分类理论存在主观说、客观说、折中说的背景下,产生了分工分类法和作用分类法两种具体的共同犯罪人分类方法,单纯采用分工分类法以及兼采两种分类方法,都会导致共犯竞合现象的产生。第三部分是对共犯竞合在刑法体系中的定位以及共犯竞合现象分类的探讨。共犯竞合应当被定位在法律效果论中,只有确定构成竞合后,才有进一步探讨的必要。对共犯竞合的分类,可以从形式上和实质上进行划分,同时结合我国实际,对我国存在的共犯竞合现象进行了划分。第四部分主要分析了解决共犯竞合现象的办法。首先阐述了在解决共犯竞合现象方面的理论分歧,应当充分采纳吸收说的观点。在具体的解决方法上,按照高度行为吸收低度行为、实行行为吸收非实行行为的原则进行处理。
[Abstract]:Complicity is a kind of special type of joint crime. Germany, Japan and other countries have discussed more about the theory of complicity, but at present, the study of accomplice in Chinese criminal law theory is not comprehensive, and the concrete manifestation is that the concrete meaning is vague. There are some deficiencies in the cause of concurrence and the method of dealing with it, but the phenomenon of complicity in judicial practice and the lack of theoretical research lead to the difficulty of applying the law in practice. The introduction of this paper is mainly about the significance of this thesis, and also briefly introduces the reasons for the problem of complicity, and then points out the current research situation of some scholars in Germany, Japan and China on the issue of complicity. Finally, the structure of the paper is explained. In addition to the introduction, this paper mainly includes four parts: the first part is to discuss the concept of complicity and its origin. At first, the author explains that the root of the joint criminal concurrence is the theory of the division of labor of the joint offender, and it is precisely because of the appearance of the division of labor classification method that the situation of one person having multiple accomplices appears in practice. At the same time, the accomplice concurrence has the characteristics of the same subject, multiple heterogeneous behaviors and multiple behaviors in the same crime. As a kind of concurrence crime, accomplice is different from law and imagination. The second part analyzes the process of the phenomenon of complicity. Under the background of subjective theory, objective theory and eclectic theory, The division of labor classification and the role of the classification of the two specific common criminal classification methods, the use of division of labor classification and both of the two classification methods, will lead to the emergence of the phenomenon of complicity. The third part discusses the orientation and classification of complicity in criminal law system. Accomplice should be positioned in the theory of legal effect. The classification of accomplice concurrence can be divided in form and substance, at the same time, the phenomenon of accomplice concurrence in our country is divided according to the reality of our country. The fourth part mainly analyzes the solution to the phenomenon of complicity. Firstly, this paper expounds the theoretical differences in solving the phenomenon of complicity, which should be fully adopted. In the concrete solution, according to the high behavior absorbs the low degree behavior, carries on the behavior absorption not to carry out the behavior principle to carry on the treatment.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】