论网络诽谤行为罪与非罪的判断与制度选择

发布时间：2018-04-29 12:00

本文选题：网络诽谤行为 + 规范架构　；参考：《宁波大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：网络诽谤犯罪行为在司法实践中遭遇罪与非罪的判断与制度上选择的的困境,本文针对遇到的困境提出解决的途径并展开相关的研究,全文共分四个部分:文章第一部分以网络诽谤行为之规范架构为开篇,分两个部分介绍,首先,网络诽谤行为“非罪”之规范架构。通过从行为的判断标准、结果的判断标准、实质恶意的判断标准三个方面对网络诽谤行为“非罪”的规范结构进行深入的分析。其次,网络诽谤行为“罪”的规范架构。通过从事实判准、情节判准两个方面对网络诽谤行为“罪”的规范架构进行分析。文章第二部分对规制网络诽谤行为实践的三重困境进行分析。第一,侵权行为,或者犯罪行为。第二,实质恶意,或者主观故意。第三,损害事实,或者危害结果。文章第三部分是分析域外网络诽谤行为规制的两种径路及其检讨。首先,域外网络诽谤行为规制的两种径路。从网络诽谤行为出罪化和入罪话两个方面对域外的情况进行分析。其次,域外网络诽谤行为规制径路之检讨。文章第四部分是对我国网络诽谤行为实践中的困境的突破方式进行分析。首先,限制诽谤归罪,运用公众人物原则、公共利益原则及诚实意见原则对网络诽谤进行归罪。其次保障言论自由,从比例原则、个案利益衡量原则及实质恶意原则来保证言论的自由。
[Abstract]:In the judicial practice of the crime of libel on the Internet, the judgment of crime and non-crime and the dilemma of system choice are encountered. This paper puts forward the ways to solve the difficulties encountered and carries out the relevant research. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part of the article begins with the normative framework of online libel, which is divided into two parts. First, the "non-criminal" normative framework of online libel. This paper makes a deep analysis of the "non-criminal" normative structure of Internet libel from three aspects, namely, the criterion of behavior, the criterion of result and the criterion of substantial malice. Secondly, the normative framework of the crime of internet libel. This paper analyzes the normative framework of the crime of internet libel from two aspects: factual judgment and plot judgment. The second part of the article analyzes the triple dilemma of regulating the practice of Internet libel. First, infringement, or criminal behavior. Second, substantial malice, or subjective intent. Third, damage the fact, or harm the result. The third part is to analyze the two ways and its review of the extraterritorial regulation of libel. First of all, there are two ways to regulate online libel. This paper analyzes the situation of internet libel from the two aspects of criminalization and incrimination. Secondly, the article reviews the regulation of internet libel. The fourth part is to analyze the breakthrough way of the predicament in the practice of internet libel in our country. First of all, we should limit slander and use public figure principle, public interest principle and honest opinion principle to impute online libel. Secondly, the freedom of speech is guaranteed by the principle of proportionality, the principle of case interest and the principle of malice.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】