“醉驾型”危险驾驶罪缓刑适用若干问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-29 12:02

本文选题：醉驾型危险驾驶罪 + 量刑　；参考：《中国海洋大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：危险驾驶罪入罪之前,学术界和实务界曾对其应否入罪有过激烈的争论。我国《刑法修正案(八)》正式将危险驾驶罪纳入刑法的调整范畴之后,使这一争论得以平息。但危险驾驶罪在施行过程中也不可避免的出现了一些问题,为此最高人民法院于2014年年初出台了相应的司法解释,破除对了某些问题的争议,但是仍然未能解决实践中出现的对醉驾型危险驾驶罪缓刑适用方面的疑惑。实践中,对醉驾性危险驾驶罪应否适用缓刑以及应如何适用缓刑的问题仍具有有争议,同时出现了不同地区对相同或相似醉驾行为入罪后,在缓刑适用方面出现较大差异的现象。有不少人不赞成适用缓刑,或者说不应过早的强调缓刑适用。当然,出现这一争论的原因是多方面的,首先,对于新规定的罪名,实践中缺乏相应的经验,无法把握量刑的尺度,更无法判断是否适用缓刑。其次,来自社会舆论的影响,也给缓刑的适用戴上了一副枷锁。但无论从立法上还是刑事政策上来看,该罪适用缓刑是应有之意。通过考察国外及我国香港地区对危险驾驶罪的规定,可以看出,很多国家对醉驾行为都规定了较为严厉的刑事处罚,但这些国家或地区并未排除对醉驾行为缓刑的适用。所以“醉驾型”危险驾驶罪适用缓刑既符合立法本意也符合宽严相济的形势政策的要求。在明确了“醉驾型”危险驾驶罪可以适用缓刑时,就应当进一步讨论如何规范的适用缓刑,既能达到惩罚的目的,又能防止缓刑的滥用。首先应科学量刑,从被告人体内的酒精含量、是否造成危害后果以及被告人的认罪态度等方面准确量刑,再对符合适用缓刑条件的被告人适用缓刑,避免出现滥用缓刑的现象。另外,可以通过完善缓刑考察内容的方式来确保缓刑的适用能够达到预期的目的。
[Abstract]:Before the criminalization of dangerous driving, there was a heated debate in academic and practical circles about whether it should be criminalized. China's Criminal Law Amendment (8) formally brought the crime of dangerous driving into the scope of adjustment of the criminal law, so that this controversy can be calmed down. However, some problems inevitably arise in the course of the implementation of the crime of dangerous driving. For this reason, the Supreme people's Court issued a corresponding judicial interpretation in early 2014 to break up the controversy over certain issues. But it still can not solve the doubt about the probation of drunk driving type dangerous driving crime in practice. In practice, there are still controversies on whether or not to apply the suspended sentence to the crime of drunk driving and how to apply the suspended sentence. At the same time, after different regions incriminate the same or similar drunken driving behavior, There is a great difference in the application of probation. Many people do not agree with the application of probation, or should not prematurely emphasize probation. Of course, there are many reasons for this argument. First of all, there is a lack of experience in the practice of the new provisions of the crime, can not grasp the measure of sentencing, but also can not judge whether to apply the probation. Secondly, the influence of public opinion also put on a pair of shackles to the application of probation. However, whether from the legislative or criminal policy point of view, the application of probation is the necessary meaning. Through the investigation of the regulations of dangerous driving crime in foreign countries and Hong Kong, we can see that many countries have provided more severe criminal punishment for drunk driving behavior, but these countries or regions have not ruled out the application of suspension of drunk driving behavior. Therefore, the "drunk driving" dangerous driving crime to apply probation is not only in line with the legislative intent but also in line with the requirements of the situation policy of lenient and strict punishment. When it is clear that "drunk driving" dangerous driving crime can be applied to probation, we should further discuss how to regulate the application of probation, which can not only achieve the purpose of punishment, but also prevent the abuse of probation. First, the scientific sentencing should be carried out from the aspects of the alcohol content in the defendant's body, the harmful consequences and the guilty attitude of the defendant, and then the probation should be applied to the defendant who meets the conditions of applying the suspended sentence, so as to avoid the phenomenon of abusing the suspended sentence. In addition, we can improve the content of probation investigation to ensure that probation can achieve the desired purpose.
【学位授予单位】：中国海洋大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】