刺杀辱母者案的刑法理论分析与技术操作

发布时间：2018-05-01 22:42

本文选题：于欢案 + 刺杀辱母者　；参考：《东方法学》2017年03期

【摘要】：山东聊城刺杀辱母者案在当下所引起的议论高潮,恰恰反映了有些司法机关的执法活动远离了现代社会的司法公正观念,远离了刑法规范评价的技术要求,也远离了人民群众的常情、常理和常识,产生了很大的负面效应。因此,我们有必要从历史、法制和人性的深处探讨这类案件的不足之处。在于欢案的刑法分析过程中,应坚持规范评价为先、为主的法治要求和司法原则;于欢虽然不能对已经停止的强制猥亵和侮辱行为进行无限防卫,但仍可以对正在进行的非法拘禁行为进行一般正当防卫;于欢致人死伤的行为由于明显超出必要限度造成重大损害,可以成立正当防卫的过当;由于正当防卫可以阻却犯罪故意的成立,所以于欢致人死亡的行为可以认定为过失致人死亡罪。刑事司法活动必须高度重视正当防卫在实践中的运用,并且通过精益求精的技术运用,对属于正当防卫的适当行为进行合法的认定给予出罪化处理。
[Abstract]:The climax of discussion caused by the murder of mothers in Liaocheng City, Shandong Province at present, precisely reflects the fact that the law enforcement activities of some judicial organs are far from the concept of judicial justice in modern society and from the technical requirements of the evaluation of criminal law norms. Also away from the people's common sense, common sense and common sense, has produced the very big negative effect. Therefore, we need to explore the inadequacies of such cases from the depth of history, legal system and human nature. In the criminal law analysis of Huan case, we should insist on the rule of law requirement and judicial principle of norm evaluation first, while Yu Huan can't defend the compulsory obscene and insulting behavior which has stopped indefinitely. But still can carry on the general justifiable defense to the illegal detention behavior in progress, the behavior that Yu Huan causes the death or injury, because obviously exceeds the necessary limit causes the significant damage, may establish the justifiable defense too; As justifiable defense can prevent the establishment of intentional crime, the act of causing death by Yu Huan can be regarded as the crime of death caused by negligence. Criminal judicial activities must attach great importance to the use of justifiable defense in practice, and through the use of technical excellence, the proper acts of legitimate defense should be criminalized.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学法律学院;
【基金】：“高水平特色法学学科建设与人才培养工程(085工程)”和“上海市一流学科建设项目”的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】