我国刑罚体系之适应性调整研究

发布时间：2018-05-02 03:23

本文选题：刑罚种类 + 刑罚个别化　；参考：《东方法学》2016年01期

【摘要】：刑罚体系的概念蕴含了刑罚种类和刑罚结构两个基本要素。我国刑罚种类设置存在刑种数量偏少、设置过于简单、刑罚个别化严重缺失、灵活性明显不足等现实问题,需要分别从个别化与社会化的刑罚发展趋势对刑罚种类进行适度拓展。刑罚个别化要求摒弃传统"刑罚"观念,并在此基础上适度增设附加刑。刑罚社会化则强调要广泛适用"社区刑罚",并进一步凸显刑罚个别化、刑种多样性以及行刑的社会化。而针对我国刑罚结构存在的生刑与死刑的比例失当、刑度脱节、个别刑种适用率低等突出问题,需要对"死刑过重,生刑过轻"观点进行重新审视,注重无期徒刑与死刑间的衔接,逐步完善管制刑和罚金刑的适用,并以此契合对刑罚结构进行的相关适应性调整。
[Abstract]:The concept of penalty system contains two basic elements: penalty type and penalty structure. In our country, there are some practical problems such as a small number of penalty types, too simple setting, serious lack of individualization of penalty, obvious lack of flexibility, etc. It is necessary to expand the types of penalty from the trend of individualization and socialization. Individualization of penalty requires abandoning the traditional concept of "penalty" and adding additional punishment on this basis. The socialization of punishment emphasizes the widespread application of community penalty, and further highlights the individualization of penalty, the variety of punishment and the socialization of execution. In view of the problems such as the misproportion between birth penalty and death penalty, the disconnection of punishment degree and the low rate of application of individual punishment in our country, it is necessary to re-examine the view that "death penalty is too heavy and birth punishment is too light". Pay attention to the connection between life imprisonment and death penalty, gradually perfect the application of control penalty and fine penalty, and fit in with the relevant adaptability adjustment of penalty structure.
【作者单位】：天津社会科学院法学研究所;
【基金】：2014年度国家社会科学基金项目“个人极端暴力犯罪的防控与治理研究”(项目编号:14BFX152)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D924.1

【共引文献】