扒窃入罪之批判性思考

发布时间：2018-05-02 05:22

本文选题：扒窃 + 违法性　；参考：《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：《刑法修正案（八）》基于扒窃的社会危害性严重、人身危险性大和主观恶性大等理由将其入刑，有其积极意义，但也因可罚的违法性程度不够而广受诟病。其一，扒窃行为不具有非入罪不足以规制的刑事违法性；其二，扒窃所具有的所谓“人身危险性”仅为潜在，，而非现实的危险状态；其三，现今有限的司法资源无法实现扒窃一律入刑；其四，扒窃一律入罪，不符合刑法的经济性与轻微犯罪非犯罪化的刑事政策。基于以上四点理由，扒窃不宜直接入刑。即便可以入刑，也不应当不加限制地一律入刑。扒窃行为一律入刑，有与刑法的价值观、可罚的违法性和罪刑均衡原则相违背之虞，且带有严重的法律工具论色彩。如今，在扒窃已然入罪的现实状况之下，徒争无益，我们应该尽力将扒窃入罪限制在合理可控的范围之内，为司法实务部门提供相对可行的适用标准。主要应从地点、对象、数额三个方面对扒窃进行严格的入罪限定，只有满足行为发生在公共场所、财物属“贴身携带”且值得刑法保护这三个条件，才可以被认定为扒窃型盗窃罪。
[Abstract]:The amendment of the Criminal Law (8), which is based on the serious social harmfulness of pickpocketing, the great personal danger and the subjective malignancy, has its positive significance, but it is also widely criticized because of the insufficiency of the degree of lawlessness that can be punished. First, the act of pickpocketing does not have the criminal illegality which is not enough to regulate it; second, the so-called "personal danger" of pickpocketing is only a potential, not a real dangerous state; third, At present, limited judicial resources can not realize the crime of pickpocketing; fourthly, the crime of pickpocketing is not in line with the economy of criminal law and the criminal policy of decriminalization of minor crime. Based on the above four reasons, pickpocketing should not be directly punished. Even if they can be punished, they should not be punished without restriction. The crime of pickpocketing is in violation of the values of criminal law, the illegality of punishment and the principle of balance between crime and punishment, and has a serious color of legal instrumentalism. Nowadays, under the actual situation that pickpocketing has already been criminalized, we should try our best to limit the crime of pickpocketing to a reasonable and controllable range, and provide a relatively feasible applicable standard for judicial practice departments. We should strictly limit the crime of pickpocketing from three aspects: location, object and amount. Only if the behavior occurs in a public place, the property is "closely carried" and deserves the protection of the criminal law. Can only be considered as pickpocketing larceny.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】