介入因素下的刑法因果关系认定研究

发布时间：2018-05-03 07:44

本文选题：刑法因果关系 + 介入因素　；参考：《辽宁大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：因果关系理论不仅是刑法总论部分的难点问题，同时也是古老而常新的争论热点，而介入因素下的刑法因果关系理论，，则是其中的焦点问题。研究刑法因果关系的最终目的是为了准确地定罪量刑，以回应罪刑相适应的刑法原则，从而真正地实现司法上的公平正义。在实行行为直接导致危害结果发生的单一因果关系案件中，司法工作人员可以准确地判定行为人应承担的刑事责任，但在司法实践中，单一因果关系的案件是非常少的，经常会介入被害人自己的行为、自然事件、第三人的行为或是行为人的二次行为，从而使案件复杂化。在整个刑法因果关系理论发展的过程中，刑法学者对因果关系主张的观点更是众说纷纭，莫衷一是，比较有代表性的学说有大陆法系的条件说、原因说、相当因果关系说、客观归责理论，英美法系的法律因果关系说以及我国的必然因果关系说和偶然因果关系说。因为判定实行行为与危害结果之间是否存在因果关系的标准比较混乱，至今没有科学统一的标准，导致司法实践中“多因一果”的案件很难得到准确的把握。由于世界各国对刑法因果关系的理论研究还不够完备，我国也在的争论中不断借鉴和吸收国外的理论研究成果以完备我国的理论体系，所以，介入因素下的刑法因果关系问题还有很大的研究空间。本文试图通过司法实践中包含介入被害人自身特殊体质、被害人自身行为、第三人的行为、自然因素的三个典型案件，从介入因素下因果关系的概念和特征入手，梳理介入因素下刑法因果关系判定的若干学说，从而整理出一套可以作为司法实务中处理介入因素下刑法因果关系案件的参考思路，并结合介入因素下刑法因果关系的考量因素分析司法实践中的三个典型案件。最后对处理司法实务中介入因素下刑法因果关系的案件提出完善建议，以期在丰富的学术研究的同时，对司法实务中的准确定罪量刑提供判断参考，实现司法公正。
[Abstract]:The theory of causality is not only a difficult problem in the general part of criminal law, but also an old and often new hot point of argument, and the theory of causality in criminal law under the intervention factor is the focal point. The ultimate purpose of studying the causality of criminal law is to accurately convict and sentence, in order to respond to the principle of criminal law adapted to crime and punishment, so as to realize justice and justice in judicature. In the case of single causality, the judicial staff can accurately determine the criminal responsibility of the perpetrator, but in judicial practice, the case of single causality is very few. It is often involved in the victim's own behavior, natural event, the third party's behavior or the actor's secondary behavior, thus complicating the case. In the course of the development of the theory of causality in criminal law, scholars of criminal law have different views on causation. There are different opinions on causality. The more representative theories are the condition theory of continental law system, the reason theory, and the theory of causation. The theory of objective imputation, the theory of legal causality in Anglo-American law system, the theory of inevitable causality and the theory of accidental causation in our country. Because the criterion of deciding whether there is causality between the practice behavior and the harmful result is confused, so far there is no scientific unified standard, so it is very difficult to accurately grasp the case of "multiple cause and effect" in the judicial practice. As the theoretical research on causality of criminal law in the world is not complete enough, our country is constantly drawing lessons from and absorbing foreign theoretical research results in the controversy in order to complete the theoretical system of our country. There is still a lot of room for research on the causality of criminal law under the intervention factors. This article attempts to involve the victim's own special constitution, the victim's own behavior, the third party's behavior, the natural factor's three typical cases in the judicial practice, starts with the concept and the characteristic of causality under the intervention factor. Combing some theories of causality judgment in criminal law under intervention factors, the author collates a set of reference ideas which can be used in judicial practice to deal with cases of criminal causality under intervening factors. Combined with the factors of causality in criminal law, the author analyzes three typical cases in judicial practice. Finally, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with the cases of causality in criminal law under the intervention factors in judicial practice, in order to provide judgment and reference to the accurate conviction and sentencing in judicial practice while enriching academic research, and to realize judicial justice.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】