论原因自由行为与责任主义的冲突及解决

发布时间：2018-05-04 00:34

本文选题：原因自由行为 + 责任主义　；参考：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】："原因自由行为"乃为刑法学的一个热点课题,这个问题从产生至今受到了广泛的关注。该类行为具有可罚性已经到了学界的广泛认可,但是一旦承认其可罚,就会违背责任主义的同时性原则。同时性原则要求"实行行为与责任能力同时存在",原因自由行为却恰恰不符合这个条件。二者之间存在的这种冲突至今没有找到完美的方法去解决。原因自由行为种类多样,除了公认的醉酒犯罪之外还包括其他情形。而且其与一般的犯罪不同,它具有特殊的行为构成和心理特点,是需要解决的疑难问题。因此,基于对刑法理论所做的全面性考量,有必要借由刑事立法来寻求解决之道。文章共分为五个部分,即:第一部分是文章的引言。引言,问题的提出和展开。原因自由行为自产生之初就受到了广泛关注。其与责任主义之间的冲突至今没有找到最适合的解决方式。目前各国均从理论和立法两方面对该行为做了规定,但都存在问题。虽然我国没有责任主义原则这一说,但是主客观相统一的原则与责任主义之间具有相似之处,因此有必要探讨一下我国的刑法理论及立法对原因自由行为的规定。第二部分责任主义原则中,笔者从责任主义的定义、内容、要素以及原则的机能几个方面展开讨论。通过这部分的理论介绍,对责任主义做一个全面的了解。第三部分是原因自由行为理论概述部分。首先对原因自由行为做一个准确的定义,对该行为做一个大体的了解。之后通过详细介绍该理论的产生及发展历程、特征、具体内容等,构建了一个较为详尽的理论体系,从而为后面讨论与责任主义的冲突及解决做铺垫。第四部分主要讨论了原因自由行为与责任主义冲突的解决。首先从两方面讲述了冲突的主要表现,之后讲述了矛盾的协调方法。在这一部分,笔者先探讨了要对矛盾进行协调的理论基础,接着讲述了目前学界对于协调二者之间矛盾所提出的学说和方式。通过分析这几种方式,了解各自的优缺点,以此提出笔者自己的看法。第五部分首先探讨了目前世界各国的立法现状,并就在立法上具有代表性的国家进行了比较详细的介绍。之后着眼于我国的理论和立法现状,讨论了目前我国立法上存在的问题,并对我国的立法完善提出了自己的意见。
[Abstract]:"cause free action" is a hot topic in criminal law, which has received extensive attention since it came into being. This kind of behavior has been widely accepted by scholars, but once it is recognized, it will violate the principle of simultaneous liability. The principle of synchronism requires that "act of practice and capacity of responsibility exist at the same time", but freedom of action does not meet this condition. The conflict between the two has so far failed to find a perfect solution. There are a variety of reasons for free behavior, including other situations in addition to recognized drunken crimes. And it is different from ordinary crime, it has the special behavior constitution and the psychological characteristic, is the difficult question which needs to solve. Therefore, based on the comprehensive consideration of the theory of criminal law, it is necessary to seek a solution by criminal legislation. The article is divided into five parts, namely: the first part is the introduction of the article. Introduction, the question raised and unfolded. The cause of free behavior has been widely concerned since the beginning of its emergence. The conflict with the doctrine of responsibility has yet to find the most suitable solution. At present, the behavior has been regulated in both theory and legislation, but there are still some problems. Although there is no principle of responsibility in China, the principle of unity of subjectivity and objectivity is similar to the principle of responsibility. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the provisions of the theory of criminal law and the legislation on the free act of reason in our country. In the second part, the author discusses the definition, content, elements and the function of the principle. Through this part of the theoretical introduction, to do a comprehensive understanding of the doctrine of responsibility. The third part is an overview of the theory of cause-free behavior. First of all, to make a precise definition of the cause of free behavior, to do a general understanding of the behavior. After that, a detailed theoretical system is constructed by introducing the origin and development course, characteristics and concrete contents of the theory in detail, thus paving the way for the later discussion on the conflict between the theory and responsibilism and its solution. The fourth part mainly discusses the solution of the conflict between free action and responsibility. First, the main manifestations of the conflict are described from two aspects, and then the conflict coordination method is described. In this part, the author first discusses the theoretical basis for the coordination of contradictions, and then describes the current academic theories and ways to coordinate the contradictions between the two. Through the analysis of these ways, understand their advantages and disadvantages, and put forward my own views. The fifth part firstly discusses the current legislation situation of the countries in the world, and introduces the representative countries in legislation in detail. Then focusing on the current situation of our country's theory and legislation, this paper discusses the existing problems in our country's legislation, and puts forward our own opinions on the perfection of our country's legislation.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】