被教唆者刑事责任新议——我国《刑法》第29条第2款解析

发布时间：2018-05-04 15:22

本文选题：《刑法》第条第款 + 教唆　；参考：《法学杂志》2017年11期

【摘要】：我国《刑法》第29条第2款应在成立共同犯罪的前提下来理解,而共同故意犯罪需把形成共同故意作为前提。被教唆者没有犯被教唆的罪所包括的情形有:被教唆者没有将被教唆的罪实施达到既遂;被教唆者接受教唆者的教唆,但实施了不同于被教唆之罪的犯罪;被教唆者受到教唆者的教唆,产生了实施有别于被教唆之罪的犯意。对教唆者从减处罚的理由在于整个共同犯罪的罪行未完成。
[Abstract]:The second paragraph of Article 29 of the Criminal Law of our country should be understood on the premise of establishing a joint crime, and the formation of joint intent should be taken as the premise of the joint intentional crime. The instigator does not commit the instigated crime including: the abettor does not commit the abetted crime to the completion, the abettor accepts the abettor's instigation, but commits the crime which is different from the abetted crime; The abetting person is abetted by the abettor, resulting in the criminal intent different from the abetting crime. The reason for abetting the abettor is that the crime of complicity is incomplete.
【作者单位】：安徽师范大学法学院;
【基金】：安徽省高校省级人文社会科学研究项目“刑事错案纠控体制研究”(项目编号:SK2014A252) 国家社科基金重点项目“依法治国与以德治国的关系研究”(项目编号:14AZD135) 安徽省检察院重点研究项目“以审判为中心的诉讼模式对检察工作的影响”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】