我国共犯体系归属研究

发布时间：2018-05-08 06:47

本文选题：共犯体系 + 正犯　；参考：《西南民族大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：共犯论因其纷繁复杂的理论学说被称为刑法学的“黑暗之章”,也因此是一个历久弥新的论域。共同犯罪较单独犯罪具有更大的社会危害性,对稳定的社会秩序构成严重威胁,及时、正确地处理共同犯罪,对实现刑法的社会保障机能至关重要。研究共同犯罪的具体问题,需要在统一的体系背景下才能深入。讨论我国共犯体系的归属即是为发展我国共犯论搭建统一的论说平台,为司法实践解决各种疑难案件明确办案思路。理论认为,处理共同犯罪问题主要存在两种体系:单一正犯体系(简称单一正犯体系)和区分二元体系(简称区分二元体系)。本文围绕我国刑法共同犯罪规定的体系归属展开,提出我国共犯体系属单一正犯体系的观点。全文共分为五章,第一章对区分二元体系理论的核心,即正犯和共犯的区分标准、共犯的处罚根据论进行作梳理,分析论证区分二元体系的固有缺陷,对区分二元体系提出质疑。第二部分在区分二元体系的概念系统下,对单一正犯体系从概念、特征、体系分类和理论基础、立法典型等方面进行全面介绍,以对单一正犯体系的本质取得较为客观的认识,为论说我国共犯体系的归属提供理论支撑。文章第三章在前两章的基础上,以“共动二重性”为框架就目前学界对我国共犯体系归属的不同认识及其主要论据进行归纳并作简单评说。第四章集中从正反两个方面论证我国共犯体系为单一正犯体系的观点,从我国刑法对共同犯罪的定义和共犯参与人的分类、平行四要件的犯罪构成论和司法实践等方面分析我国共犯体系所独有的特征,提出德日刑法所主张的区分二元体系并不适合我国本土环境的观点。第五章在证明我国共犯规定属单一正犯体系的前提下,提出存在向功能的单一正犯体系解释的必要性和可能性。此外,还对学理上错综复杂的概念从本源上予以厘清,对学理上广泛讨论的几个问题进行说明,以矫正对单一正犯体系和我国共犯体系的错误认识,从而强化本文论点。文章的创新点集中于第三章和第四章,笔者通过“共动二重性”归纳总结学界就我国共犯体系本质的不同认识,再对一些具体问题提出质疑的同时结合我国独有的法律背景说明个人的看法。在研究方法上,本文以丰富的文献资料和调查材料为研究基础,采取案例分析、比较研究、理论分析等方法,按照“先理论到实践”、“先国外到国内”、“先宏观到微观”的逻辑思路完成。
[Abstract]:The theory of accomplice, because of its complicated and complicated theory, is called "the dark chapter" of the criminal law, and it is also a long period of discussion. The common crime has more social harmfulness than the individual crime. It poses a serious threat to the stable social order. It is timely, correctly handling the common crime and the social security function of the criminal law. It is important to study the specific problems of common crime in the context of a unified system. The discussion of the attribution of the system of accomplice in our country is to build a unified platform for the development of the theory of the common crime in our country, and to solve various difficult cases by judicial practice. The theory holds that there are two main bodies in dealing with the problem of common crime. Department: a single criminal system (a single principal offender system) and a distinction between two yuan (two yuan system). This article focuses on the ownership of the system of common crime in China's criminal law, and puts forward the view of the system of the single criminal in our country's accomplice system. The full text is divided into five chapters, and the first chapter is the core of the theory of distinguishing the two yuan system, namely, the principal offender and the Communist Party. The distinction standard of criminal offense, the punishment basis of the accomplice is combed, the inherent defects of the two yuan system are analyzed, and the two yuan system is questioned. The second part, under the concept system of distinguishing the two yuan system, gives a comprehensive introduction to the concept, characteristics, classification and theoretical basis of the single criminal system, and the typical legislative aspects. In order to obtain a more objective understanding of the essence of a single criminal system and to provide theoretical support for the attribution of the system of accomplice in our country, the third chapter, on the basis of the first two chapters, sums up and makes a brief comment on the different understanding and its main arguments on the attribution of our country's accomplice system with the framework of "common movement duality". The four chapter argues from the two aspects of the positive and negative aspects of our country's accomplice system as a single positive criminal system, from the definition of common crime and the classification of the participants of the accomplice, the criminal constitution and judicial practice of the four elements in the criminal law of our country, and the special characteristics of the system of accomplice in our country, and the distinction of two yuan advocated by the German and Japanese criminal law is put forward. The system is not suitable for the native environment of our country. The fifth chapter, on the premise of proving that our country's accomplice is a single criminal system, puts forward the necessity and possibility of interpretation of the existence of a single positive criminal system to function. In order to correct the wrong understanding of the system of the single principal offender and the system of accomplice in our country, we should strengthen the argument in this article. The innovation of the article is concentrated in the third and fourth chapters. The author sums up the different understanding of the essence of the system of accomplice in our country through the "co action duality", and then questions some specific questions at the same time. The unique legal background of the country shows the personal view. In the study method, this paper takes rich literature and investigation materials as the research basis, adopts case analysis, comparative study, theoretical analysis and other methods, according to "first theory to practice", "first abroad to domestic", "first macro to micro" logic thought.

【学位授予单位】：西南民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924

【相似文献】