不能犯问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-11 00:10

本文选题：不能犯 + 未遂犯　；参考：《河南大学》2005年硕士论文

【摘要】：对于不能犯,我国刑法立法没有明确规定,理论上也缺乏深入的研究。但考察不能犯概念的渊源和比较国内外立法、理论,可以发现,我国的不能犯立法、理论与国外有较大的差异。在比较研究的基础上,本文认为,这种差异反映出我国刑法在未遂犯问题上的主观主义立场,而这种立场与当前重视人权保障的社会价值趋向以及刑事法治的进程不相一致。本文进而提出,应重新界定不能犯的概念,不能犯应包括不可罚的不能犯与不能犯未遂。对于两者的区分,本文提出了双层次危险判断说,即应以行为时社会上一般人可能认识到的事实为判断资料,由一般人做出判断,如一般人认为行为具有危险,则是不能犯未遂,如一般人认为行为不具有危险,则成立不可罚的不能犯。全文约 4.8 万字,分以下五个部分: 第一部分:引言。该部分概述了国内不能犯立法和理论的现状,并对全文的写作思路进行了说明。第二部分:不能犯概述。该部分比较了国内外不能犯立法与理论,并分析差异的原因。在大陆法系主要国家,不能犯并不构成未遂犯,不能犯概念的提出正是为了限制未遂犯的范围,而我国,不能犯是未遂犯的一种。差异的原因在于对未遂犯的不同立场:客观主义立场认为,未遂犯的处罚根据在于行为的客观危险或产生构成要件结果的危险,不能犯不具备这种危险,当然不可罚;主观主义立场则在行为人的意思危险性即主观犯意中探求未遂犯的处罚根据,不能犯中的行为人具有这种主观犯意,成立未遂犯。第三部分:我国不能犯的界定。该部分首先论述了我国通说在不能犯问题上的主观主义立场和这种立场的缺陷。在此基础上,指出,应重新界定不能犯的概念,将其分为不可罚的不能犯与不能犯未遂,从而限制未遂犯的范围,并提出如何区别不可罚的不能犯与不能犯未遂的观点,即双层次危险判断说。最后对不能犯的立法完善提出了建议。
[Abstract]:The criminal law legislation of our country is not clearly stipulated, and there is a lack of deep research in theory. However, by examining the origin of the concept of impossibility and comparing the domestic and foreign legislation and theory, we can find that there is a great difference between the theory and foreign countries. On the basis of comparative study, this paper holds that this difference reflects the subjectivism position of criminal law on the issue of attempted crime, which is inconsistent with the social value trend of paying attention to human rights protection and the process of criminal rule by law. This paper further suggests that the concept of impossibility should be redefined, and that the concept of impossibility should include the non-punishable and the attempted. For the distinction between the two, this paper puts forward a two-level risk judgment, that is, the facts that the average person in the society may realize at the time of the act should be taken as the judgment data, and the general person should make the judgment, such as the average person thinks that the behavior is dangerous. It is not attempted, if the general view is not dangerous, then can not be punished. The full text is about 48000 words, divided into the following five parts: The first part: introduction. This part summarizes the current situation of domestic legislation and theory, and explains the ideas of the full text. The second part: the outline of non-offense. This part compares the legislation and theory at home and abroad, and analyzes the reasons for the difference. In the main countries of civil law system, impossibility does not constitute attempted crime, and the concept of impossibility is put forward in order to limit the scope of attempted crime. In our country, impossibility is a kind of unaccomplished crime. The reason for the difference lies in the different positions on attempted crime: the objectivism standpoint holds that the punishment of attempted offence is based on the objective danger of the act or the danger of producing the result of the constituent elements, which cannot be committed without such danger, and is certainly not punishable; The subjectivism position explores the punishment basis of the attempted crime in the subjective intention of the perpetrator, and the actor who cannot commit the crime has this subjective criminal intention to establish the attempted offence. The third part: the definition of impossibility in our country. This part first discusses the subjectivism and the defects of the general theory in the problem of impossibility. On this basis, it is pointed out that the concept of impossibility should be redefined and divided into non-punishable and attempted, so as to limit the scope of attempted crime, and put forward the point of view on how to distinguish between non-punishable and non-criminal. That is, double-tier danger judgment. At last, some suggestions are put forward to perfect the legislation that can not be committed.
【学位授予单位】：河南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】