财产罪法益研究—修正的“占有说”之提倡

发布时间：2018-05-12 02:20

本文选题：法益 + 财产犯罪　；参考：《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：法益作为大陆法系刑法理论中的概念，相较于我国的“犯罪客体”而言更具合理性。正确构造财产罪法益，可以合理确定财产罪的刑罚处罚范围，解决现实生活中关于侵犯财产行为的司法实践难题，使得不同的行为得到公正合理的评价。我国的财产罪法益学说主要有所有权说、占有说和中间说。国外对于财产罪法益的研究较为深入，德国刑法学界对财产罪法益的问题通过法律的财产说、经济的财产说、法律的经济的财产说的争论展开；日本刑法学界存在本权说、占有说和各种中间学说。由于占有说不当扩大了对侵财行为的刑罚处罚范围，，而所有权说或本权说缩小了刑罚处罚范围，因此本文提出修正的“占有说”。本文认为，财产罪的法益原则上是占有，但相对于所有权人或其他本权人取回财物的行为而言，该种占有不是财产罪的法益。修正的“占有说”在刑法理论体系中能够得到合理的解释，且与我国刑事法律规定相符合。在司法实践中，最高人民法院编排的判例原则上体现出与修正的“占有说”相同的倾向，只是在非法占有目的这一问题上，最高院的观点违背了刑法理论而不为修正的“占有说”所取。
[Abstract]:As a concept in the theory of criminal law in continental law system, legal interest is more reasonable than the object of crime in our country. The correct construction of legal interests of property crime can reasonably determine the scope of punishment of property crime, solve the problem of judicial practice of infringing property in real life, and make different acts get fair and reasonable evaluation. The theory of legal interests of property crime in our country mainly includes ownership theory, possession theory and intermediate theory. The research on legal interest of property crime abroad is more in-depth. The legal interests of property crime in Germany are discussed through the property theory of law, the property theory of economy, the property theory of economy of law, and the theory of right of law in the field of criminal law in Japan. Possessive theory and various intermediate doctrines. Because the misrepresentation of possession expands the scope of punishment for pecuniary invasion, and the theory of ownership or this right narrows the scope of punishment, this paper puts forward a revised theory of "possession". This paper holds that the legal interest of the property crime is possession in principle, but the possession is not the legal interest of the property crime compared with the property recovery by the owner or other persons. The revised "possession theory" can be reasonably interpreted in the criminal law theory system and is in accordance with the criminal law in our country. In judicial practice, the judicial precedent arranged by the Supreme people's Court embodies in principle the same tendency as the amended "possession theory", but only on the issue of the purpose of illegal possession. The Supreme Court's view runs counter to criminal law theory and is not taken for the revised possession theory.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】