民间借贷与诈骗犯罪的相关问题分析

发布时间：2018-05-12 01:39

本文选题：借贷纠纷 + 诈骗罪　；参考：《沈阳师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：从几年前的“许霆案”到最近广受争议的“吴英案”，人们对这两起案件到底应该归民事相关法调整还是刑事相关法调整产生了很大的争议。随着社会经济的发展，人民生活水平的提高，人的社会行为变得越来越复杂多样，造成司法实践中法律认定的困难，产生很多疑难问题。对于此类复杂的案件如何界定其案件性质是近来学界讨论的热点。民间借贷是我们身边很常见很普通的一种民事法律行为，它与以借贷为名义的诈骗犯罪在表现上有很多相似的地方，如何区分一个案件到底属于民间借贷纠纷还是诈骗犯罪，是司法实践的一个难题，，也关系到涉案当事人的合法权益的保护问题和司法公正问题，正确区分这两者显得意义非凡，笔者提出一些在司法实践中应当注意的问题，希望法律真真正正的成为公民的保护伞。笔者查阅了一些法院审判的案件，选取了本文这个比较典型的案例，通过案例，并结合其他学者的一些著述，运用案例分析、文献分析、比较分析等方法，探究民间借贷与诈骗罪的界定问题，并对案例进行了一些发散思考，提出借贷案件在司法实践中要防止犯罪化、重刑化，司法实践中非法占有目的认定时应注意的问题，以及《刑法》需要增加一些不需要“非法占有目的”的犯罪来调整新出现的一些情况。
[Abstract]:From the case of Xu Ting a few years ago to the recently controversial case of Wu Ying, there has been a great controversy as to whether the two cases should belong to the adjustment of civil related law or criminal related law. With the development of social economy and the improvement of people's living standard, people's social behavior becomes more and more complex and diverse, resulting in the difficulty of legal recognition in judicial practice and many difficult problems. How to define the nature of such complicated cases is a hot topic in recent academic circles. Folk lending is a very common civil legal act around us. It has many similarities with the crime of fraud in the name of borrowing. How to distinguish whether a case belongs to a private loan dispute or a fraud crime? It is a difficult problem in judicial practice, and it is also related to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved in the case and the issue of judicial justice. It is of great significance to correctly distinguish these two issues. The author puts forward some problems that should be paid attention to in the judicial practice. I hope that the law will truly become an umbrella for citizens. The author consulted some court cases, selected this relatively typical case, through the case, and combined with some other scholars' writings, using case analysis, literature analysis, comparative analysis and other methods. This paper probes into the definition of the crime of folk borrowing and fraud, and makes some divergent reflections on the case, and puts forward some problems that should be paid attention to when the purpose of illegal possession is determined in the judicial practice, such as preventing the crime and heavy punishment in the judicial practice. And the Criminal Law needs to add some crimes that do not require the purpose of illegal possession to adjust some new situations.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923;D924.1

【参考文献】