当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

夏俊峰案法理分析

发布时间:2018-05-13 11:27

  本文选题:城管执法 + 被害人过错 ; 参考:《河北经贸大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:近年来,,城管问题一直为大家所关注,本来城管与城市里靠三轮车维持生计的小商贩是正常的管理者和被管理者的关系,现今却逐渐演变成驱逐与逃跑、管理与生存的对立状态。新闻媒体曝出的各种城管暴力执法、不文明执法的现象也层出不穷。这就不仅使城管披上了粗暴野蛮的形象,也使城市的流动小贩置于生存的弱者地位。然而,社会舆论总是自然而然地倾向弱者,所以夏俊峰这个案子让人不自觉地想到他是因为对城管粗暴执法感到极端愤怒而做出的杀人行为。夏俊峰于2013年9月25日被注射死刑,他希望妻子张晶在他死后能为他继续申诉,因为他直到被执行死刑前还坚称自己是正当防卫。我们不得不说夏俊峰案是一个悲剧,这起案件不仅使夏俊峰失去了宝贵的生命,而且还给三个家庭带去了挥之不去的伤痛。随着夏俊峰死刑执行的结束,这起案件背后隐藏的法理问题,如夏俊峰的行为是否构成故意杀人罪,是否构成正当防卫,被害人是否对结果的发生有过错及是否存在激情犯罪等问题值得我们更进一步的探讨。 本论文由四大部分内容构成。第一部分是引言,具体介绍了本案的选题背景及意义、国内外研究现状、研究方法与创新。简单阐述了国内外对本案和城管执法的研究情况,为下文的分析作了铺垫。第二部分的内容是案情综述,在介绍了基本案情和判决结果后,阐述了控辩双方争议的焦点,即被告人主观方面问题、被害人是否有过错、被害人是否有防卫情节及在量刑上对夏俊峰适用死刑是否得当,这些影响着对本案的定罪。第三部分的内容是本案法理分析,分为两个小节,第一小节是夏俊峰案定罪问题分析,其中包括:夏俊峰的行为是否构成故意杀人罪、是否构成正当防卫;第二小节是夏俊峰案量刑问题分析,结合我国现行法律对量刑问题的规定探讨被害人过错是否能够影响量刑及激情犯罪作为量刑情节的正当性问题。第四部分的内容是夏俊峰案的启示,分为两个小节,第一个小节是本案对司法的现实意义及有益借鉴,其中包括:有过错能否对其正当防卫、本案能否适用死刑及其对司法的启示和对我国城管执法的建议;第二个小节是对我国死刑量刑的现状和改善的思考。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the issue of urban management has always been the focus of attention. Originally, the relationship between urban management and small vendors in the city who depend on tricycles to earn a living is a normal relationship between the manager and the managed, but now it has gradually evolved into expulsion and escape. The opposite state of management and survival. News media exposure of various urban management violence law enforcement, uncivilized law enforcement phenomenon also emerge in endlessly. This not only put the city management on a rough and barbaric image, but also put the city's itinerant vendors in the position of the weak survival. However, public opinion tends naturally to the weak, so Xia Junfeng's case makes one unconsciously think of his murderous behavior as a result of extreme anger at the rough law enforcement of the chengguan. Xia Junfeng, who was shot to death on September 25, 2013, wants his wife, Zhang Jing, to continue to complain for him after his death, because he insisted he was defending himself until he was executed. We have to say that Xia Junfeng case is a tragedy. This case not only made Xia Junfeng lose his precious life, but also brought lingering pain to three families. With the end of Xia Junfeng's death sentence, there are hidden legal issues behind the case, such as whether Xia Junfeng's actions constitute intentional homicide and whether he constitutes justifiable defense. Whether the victim is at fault with the result and whether there is a crime of passion is worthy of further discussion. This thesis consists of four parts. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the background and significance of the topic, the current research situation, the research methods and innovations at home and abroad. This paper briefly describes the domestic and foreign research on this case and urban management law enforcement, which paves the way for the following analysis. The second part is the summary of the case. After introducing the basic case and the result of the judgment, the author expounds the focus of the dispute between the prosecution and the defense, that is, the subjective aspects of the defendant, whether the victim is at fault, Whether the victim has defensive circumstances and whether he applies the death penalty to Xia Junfeng in sentencing affects the conviction of this case. The third part is the legal analysis of the case, which is divided into two sections. The first section is the analysis of the conviction of Xia Junfeng, including: whether Xia Junfeng's behavior constitutes intentional homicide and self-defense; The second section is the case of Xia Junfeng sentencing analysis, combined with the current law of our country on sentencing provisions to explore whether the fault of the victim can affect sentencing and passion crime as the justification of sentencing circumstances. The fourth part is the revelation of Xia Junfeng case, which is divided into two sections. The first section is the practical significance of the case to the judiciary and useful reference, including: whether there is fault to its legitimate defense, Whether the death penalty can be applied in this case and its enlightenment to the administration of justice and the suggestions to the law enforcement of chengguan in our country; the second section is about the present situation and improvement of sentencing of death penalty in our country.
【学位授予单位】:河北经贸大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 田庆生;郝如建;;被害人过错的司法适用[J];产业与科技论坛;2007年11期

2 李亚丹;;浅析城管与小商贩冲突的根源及解决之道[J];东方企业文化;2010年01期

3 任志中;汪敏;;被害人过错与死刑适用[J];法律适用;2009年01期

4 林亚刚;袁雪;;酌定量刑情节若干问题研究[J];法学评论;2008年06期

5 夏勇;;解读中外“激情犯罪”——“药家鑫杀人案”引出的话题[J];法学;2011年05期

6 梅文娟;;论被害人过错的量刑意义[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2010年11期

7 李玉萍;;量刑与社会调查报告[J];法制资讯;2008年06期

8 张晓亮;李希;;浅析被害人过错对量刑的影响[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年06期

9 赵廷光;;论“电脑量刑”的基本原理[J];湖北警官学院学报;2007年02期

10 郭子贤;激情犯罪探析[J];湖湘论坛;2005年06期



本文编号:1882956

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1882956.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d753d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com