“酌定从重处罚情节”之否定——一个罪刑法定主义的当然逻辑

发布时间：2018-05-13 16:51

本文选题：酌定从重处罚情节 + 罪刑法定原则　；参考：《政法论坛》2016年06期

【摘要】：酌定从重处罚情节不仅在我国刑法理论上得到普遍承认,而且在司法活动中被广泛适用。刑法司法中广泛适用酌定从重处罚情节的理由在于刑法立法的不明确。然而,适用酌定从重处罚情节不仅有违"法无明文规定不处罚",而且与法定从重处罚情节存在冲突,同时不符合量刑基准的基本要求。案件社会学为酌定从重处罚情节的存在提供了理论依据,也为其合理性划定了界限。在法治社会,"酌定从重处罚情节"的概念和逻辑应当被否定,但对其实际内容应依据并合主义的刑罚正当化根据进行取舍。
[Abstract]:The circumstance of discretionary heavier punishment is not only generally recognized in the theory of criminal law, but also widely used in judicial activities. The reason why the circumstance of heavier punishment is widely applied in criminal law is that the legislation of criminal law is not clear. However, the application of discretionary aggravating circumstances is not only contrary to "the law does not explicitly stipulate that no punishment", but also conflict with the statutory aggravating circumstances, and does not meet the basic requirements of sentencing criteria. The sociology of cases not only provides the theoretical basis for the existence of discretionary aggravating circumstances, but also delimits the limits of its reasonableness. In a society ruled by law, the concept and logic of "discretionary aggravating circumstances" should be negated, but the actual content should be chosen on the basis of the justification of the punishment of amalgamation.
【作者单位】：河北大学政法学院暨河北大学国家治理法治化研究中心;
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】