新《食品安全法》的刑事责任优先

发布时间：2018-05-13 18:54

本文选题：食品安全法 + 刑法　；参考：《学术探索》2015年12期

【摘要】：新《食品安全法》规定了全面、严格的法律责任,更树立起刑事责任优先的法律理念。刑事责任优先是对刑法谦抑原则的相对突破。食品安全犯罪是典型的法定犯,与某些食品安全违法行为表现一致、特征相符,导致实践中出现行刑不分、以罚代刑的责任混淆,亟须甄别两种不同责任承担方式。在此基础上,坚持刑事责任优先的法律理念,需要在理念层面上采纳"刑罚优先适用说",在操作层面上完善行政违法行为与食品安全犯罪的执法、司法案件相互移送和结果互认,整体上实现对食品安全违法犯罪行为的有效规制。
[Abstract]:The new Food Safety Law stipulates comprehensive and strict legal liability and sets up the legal concept of criminal liability first. The priority of criminal responsibility is a relative breakthrough to the principle of modesty in criminal law. Food safety crime is a typical legal offense, which is consistent with some illegal food safety behaviors and the characteristics are consistent, which leads to the confusion of the responsibility of execution and punishment in practice. It is urgent to identify two different ways of taking responsibility. On this basis, to adhere to the legal concept of criminal responsibility priority, we need to adopt the "penalty priority application theory" at the conceptual level, and improve the law enforcement of administrative illegal acts and food safety crimes at the operational level. Judicial cases are transferred to each other and the results are recognized each other, so as to achieve effective regulation of food safety crimes.
【作者单位】：盐城师范学院法政学院;
【基金】：江苏盐城国家级珍禽自然保护区管理处项目资助(2015YYHZ018)
【分类号】：D922.16;D924.3

【参考文献】