盗窃罪中扒窃行为问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-14 00:39

本文选题：扒窃 + 内涵　；参考：《吉林财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：作为盗窃罪的一种类型,目前司法实务界和学者对扒窃行为仍然在一些问题的认识上存在争议,这也导致扒窃行为在实务中认定标准的不统一与泛化的趋势。因此需要对这些争议进行研究分析,理清相关要素,为今后扒窃行为的司法适用提供有益的参考。本文通过司法解释与不同学术理论的观点的结合,对扒窃行为进行概念界定,清楚地说明扒窃行为具有的特征。对于扒窃行为立法过程特别是立法前动态的介绍,体现扒窃行为入刑的依据。对于扒窃行为目前仍存在的问题,主要阐述三个突出的问题:公共场所范围难以界定、随时携带理解的分歧与对判断扒窃行为犯罪形态价值取向不同坚持所带来的实务适用偏差。在前述基础上对问题的成因进行分析,分别是扒窃行为入刑的立法缺陷和扒窃行为在实践适用标准不一。对上述存在的问题具体提出解决的意见。在立法上对扒窃入刑规定的缺陷进行完善。实务认定标准应当统一,要明确扒窃行为属于结果犯,同时注重刑法总则中的但书条款对扒窃认定和具体量刑的影响。具体分析扒窃的构成要素中的关键点,即公共场所和随身携带,使得扒窃行为入罪的法律标准清晰明确。此外对于是否应该存在数额限制给出明确的认定,还对扒窃的对象范围进行有效的界定。
[Abstract]:As a type of larceny, there are still some disputes on the understanding of pickpocketing in the judicial practice and scholars, which also leads to the trend of disunity and generalization of the standard of pickpocketing in practice. Therefore, it is necessary to study and analyze these disputes, to clarify the relevant elements, and to provide a useful reference for the judicial application of pickpocketing in the future. Through the combination of judicial interpretation and different academic theories, this paper defines the concept of pickpocketing and clearly explains the characteristics of pickpocketing. The introduction of the legislative process of pickpocketing, especially before the legislation, reflects the basis of the crime of pickpocketing. As for the problems that still exist in pickpocketing, three outstanding problems are mainly elaborated: the scope of public places is difficult to define, The difference of understanding at any time and the difference of value orientation in judging the crime of pickpocketing bring the deviation of practical application. On the basis of the above analysis, the causes of the problem are the legislative defects of the crime of pickpocketing and the difference of the applicable standards of pickpocketing in practice. The above-mentioned existing problems are specifically put forward to solve the views. In legislation, the defects of the provisions of pickpocketing into criminal law are improved. The standard of practical identification should be unified, it should be made clear that pickpocketing is a consequential offence, and the influence of proviso clause in the general rules of criminal law on the identification of pickpocketing and the specific sentencing should be emphasized. The analysis of the key elements of pickpocketing, that is, public places and carry-on, makes the legal standard of the crime of pickpocketing clear and clear. In addition, whether there should be a limit on the amount of money should be clearly identified, and the scope of the object of pickpocketing is effectively defined.
【学位授予单位】：吉林财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.35

【相似文献】