网络诽谤情节要素的认定

发布时间：2018-05-17 07:13

本文选题：网络诽谤 + 情节要素　；参考：《武汉大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：当今社会是一个信息社会,随着互联网的不断发展,利用网络进行违法犯罪活动的情形日益增多。网络诽谤作为传统犯罪的网络异化,具有新的特点。为了应对新形势下日益猖狂的网络诽谤犯罪,最高人民法院、最高人民检察院于2013年9月6日发布了《关于办理利用信息网络实施诽谤等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》。本文拟从对该司法解释相关条文的分析入手,反思刑法介入"网络诽谤"行为的限度以及标准。本文主要从以下几个章节展开:第一章主要是网络诽谤的概述。作为本文的开篇,首先对网络诽谤的概念进行梳理,指明网络诽谤的特征。同时深入分析了网络诽谤的法益保护与公民的言论自由之间的关系,探寻如何在保护网络诽谤所侵犯的法益与保障公民言论的自由之间实现动态平衡。第二章主要是网络诽谤的情节要素。首先介绍了我国刑法对于诽谤罪的规定以及两高《关于办理利用信息网络实施诽谤等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》中对于情节要素认定的标准。接下来分析《解释》定量标准具有的进步之处,以及在其合理表象下存在的问题。第三章是本文的重点章节,主要是指出现有法律及司法解释存在的问题。首先是实质与形式的混乱,又细分为四种情况进行讨论,指出其在认定网络诽谤方面存在的问题。其次是独立与受制的混乱,从法理和司法实践层面指出定量标准的不合理之处。第四章主要是网络诽谤情节要素认定的再思考。针对上文所述《解释》的定量标准所存在的问题,指出要用合理的标准来限制刑法的适用范围,实现打击网络诽谤犯罪和保护公民言论自由之间的平衡。不仅在原则上应该遵循法益侵害原则和比例原则,而且在情节要素的认定标准上也作了一定的思考。
[Abstract]:Today's society is an information society, with the continuous development of the Internet, the use of network to carry out illegal and criminal activities is increasing. Network defamation, as a network alienation of traditional crime, has new characteristics. In order to deal with the increasingly rampant network defamation crime under the new situation, the Supreme People's court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate in 2013 9 On the 6 day, the interpretation of the application of law on the application of defamation of information network to criminal cases was published. This article, starting with the analysis of the relevant provisions of the judicial interpretation, rethinks the limits and standards of the criminal law intervening "network defamation". This article mainly starts from the following chapters: the first chapter is mainly network defamation First of all, as the beginning of this article, first of all, combing the concept of network defamation, pointing out the characteristics of network defamation, and analyzing the relationship between legal protection of Internet libel and the freedom of speech of citizens, and exploring the dynamic balance between protecting the legal benefit of network defamation and protecting the freedom of citizen's speech. The second chapter is mainly about the plot elements of network defamation. First, it introduces the provisions of China's criminal law on the crime of libel, and the criteria for the determination of the plot elements in the two high standards of the application of the law on the application of defamation in the criminal cases of the use of information networks. The third chapter is the key chapter of this article. It mainly refers to the existing problems in the legal and judicial interpretation. First, it is the confusion of the essence and the form, and it is subdivided into four cases to discuss the problems in the identification of network defamation. And the judicial practice level points out the unreasonable of the quantitative standard. The fourth chapter is the rethinking of the identification of the elements of the network defamation. In view of the problems existing in the quantitative standard of the above interpretation, it is pointed out that the scope of application of criminal law should be restricted by reasonable standards, and the crime of defamation of network and the protection of freedom of speech of citizens should be realized. The balance should not only follow the principle of violation of legal interests and the principle of proportionality, but also make certain considerations on the criteria for determining the elements of a plot.
【学位授予单位】：武汉大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】