最高限度与最低限度罪刑法定的划分及其意义——对传统罪刑法定原则分层策略的反思与重构

发布时间：2018-05-18 16:21

本文选题：罪刑法定 + 派生原则　；参考：《政治与法律》2017年09期

【摘要】：分层策略是我国罪刑法定原则研究中的重要问题。在传统的分层策略中,无论是积极与消极罪刑法定,还是形式与实质罪刑法定,抑或是绝对与相对罪刑法定,都存在一个共同的缺陷,即缺乏明确的理论目的性,无法对接我国刑事司法实践的现实需求。我国的刑事司法实践需要具有明确目的性、针对现实问题的罪刑法定原则分层策略。这种目的性可以描述为,既坚持罪刑法定基本原理,又增加其司法适用性;既兼顾罪刑法定的司法话语,又对接罪刑法定的大众话语;既维护罪刑法定的既有话语体系,又促进罪刑法定的自我进化。最高限度与最低限度罪刑法定的分层策略,正是以实现这三个"既……,又……"为目标的。考虑到我国罪刑法定主义"启蒙"与"反思"阶段同时存在的现实,根据罪刑法定司法化的现实需要,应设计出新的罪刑法定原则的分层策略。
[Abstract]:The stratification strategy is an important issue in the study of the principle of legality in China. In the traditional stratification strategy, there is a common defect in both the positive and negative legality, the form and the substantive crime of punishment, or the absolute and relative punishment, that is, the lack of the definite theoretical purpose and the criminal judicial reality in our country. The practical needs of the criminal judicature in our country need a strategy of delamination in the principle of the legal principle of crime and punishment. This purpose can be described as not only to uphold the basic principle of the legality of the crime, but also to increase its judicial applicability; it not only takes into account the legal discourse of the legality of the crime, but also butted the public discourse of the criminal law; The criminal law for the protection of crime has both the system of discourse and the self evolution of the legality of the crime. The strategy of delamination of the maximum and minimum legality is the goal of realizing the three "both, and." considering the reality that the "Enlightenment" and "reflection" of the Legalism of our country are at the same time, and according to the practical needs of the legal judicature of the crime and punishment. We should design a new delamination strategy for the principle of legality.
【作者单位】：中共天津市委党校滨海分校;
【基金】：中共天津市委党校(天津行政学院)系统科研课题“刑法修正案溯及力问题研究”(项目编号:DXXYXT16-15)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】