法秩序一致性与合宪性解释的实体性论证

发布时间：2018-05-19 01:45

本文选题：比例原则 + 法秩序一致性　；参考：《环球法律评论》2015年02期

【摘要】：作为重要的解释方法,合宪性解释立基于法秩序一致性之考虑,主张刑法解释不抵牾宪法的精神与原则,从而揭示刑法实践中的各种宪法适用问题。构成要件明确性原则乃是界定合宪性解释范畴的理论分析工具,只有那种应当符合构成要件明确性原则而规范却不明确的领域,才有合宪性解释的空间。合宪性解释作为一种价值论证活动,必须立足于宪法性法益,为解释结论之证力提供最充分的理由,以确保刑法解释的整全合法性。而比例原则则以其目的正当性、手段必要性和法益权衡性,处理公民自由与他人权利、公民自由与社会秩序、国家公权与公民权利等之间的利益关系,构成合宪性解释的规则性证成。
[Abstract]:As an important method of interpretation, constitutional interpretation is based on the consideration of the consistency of legal order, and advocates that the interpretation of criminal law does not contradict the spirit and principles of the Constitution, thus revealing various constitutional application problems in criminal law practice. The principle of definitude of constitutive elements is a theoretical analysis tool to define the category of constitutionality interpretation. Only in the field which should conform to the clear principle of constitutive elements but not be regulated clearly can there be room for constitutionality interpretation. As an activity of value argumentation, constitutionality interpretation must be based on constitutional legal interests and provide the most sufficient reasons for the power of proof of interpretation conclusion in order to ensure the complete legality of criminal law interpretation. The principle of proportionality, on the other hand, deals with the interests of civil liberties and other rights, civil liberties and social order, state public rights and civil rights, based on the legitimacy of its purpose, the necessity of means and the tradeoff of legal interests. The rule of proof that constitutes the interpretation of constitutionality.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：“江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目”(PAPD) 国家社科基金项目“刑事政策制约刑法解释的理论建构与制度实践研究”(项目编号:13CFX045)资助
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】