犯罪构成要件体系对定罪证明标准的影响——以引入阶层式犯罪构成体系为核心

发布时间：2018-05-19 19:30

本文选题：犯罪构成要件体系 + 证明标准　；参考：《广西社会科学》2015年11期

【摘要】：定罪证明标准是建构与解构、证实与证伪、静态判断与动态推理多维互动的结果。传统的四要件犯罪构成体系缺乏解构的逻辑基础,忽视以证伪方法为核心的出罪机制,在推理过程中片面强调静态的形式印证,这些缺陷造成了认定犯罪信息的不对称,并且使裁判带有一定的恣意性。阶层式构罪思维则能与定罪标准实现契合,它为建构与解构的统一、证实与证伪的结合、静态与动态的衔接创造条件。在相关制度保障的基础上,引入阶层式犯罪构成体系,法官就能够理性地认定犯罪,使裁判符合确信无疑的标准。
[Abstract]:The standard of conviction proof is the result of multidimensional interaction between construction and deconstruction, confirmation and falsification, static judgment and dynamic reasoning. The traditional four-element crime constitution system lacks the logical foundation of deconstruction, neglects the crime mechanism with the method of falsification as the core, and emphasizes the static form verification in the reasoning process. These defects result in the asymmetry of the information in the identification of the crime. And make the referee with a certain degree of arbitrariness. On the other hand, the thought of hierarchical crime can be conformed to the standard of conviction. It creates the conditions for the unity of construction and deconstruction, the combination of confirmation and falsification, and the connection between static and dynamic. On the basis of the guarantee of relevant system, the judge can reasonably identify the crime and make the judge meet the standard of certainty by introducing the hierarchical crime constitution system.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：西南政法大学研究生科研创新(校级)一般项目(XZYJS2014088)
【分类号】：D914

【相似文献】