醉酒驾驶入罪问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-19 21:45

本文选题：《刑法修正案(八)》 + 犯罪圈划定　；参考：《延边大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：虽然我国《刑法修正案(八)》已明确将醉酒驾驶行为规定为犯罪,但对于酒驾入罪是否恰当的争论没有停止过,笔者对此争论始终持否定意见。自酒驾入刑两年以来,其社会效果由显著到略有回升,其面临的司法困境尚未得到改善,这些现象都是对醉酒驾驶入罪合理性的质疑。刑罚并不是惩罚酒驾的最适当途径,也并不是预防酒驾的最后手段,从刑法的谦抑性原则和刑罚配置的经济性原则角度讲,酒驾入罪是浪费刑法资源的表现。另一方面,与国外不同,我国对犯罪圈的划定采用定性和定量两个标准,而酒驾入刑并不符合此标准。因此,不能盲目的借鉴国外立法,应从我国的实际情况出发,重新考虑酒驾入罪问题。文章共分六章展开论述。第一章,绪论,介绍了本文相关研究目的和意义,并对研究现状和研究方法作了说明。第二章,醉酒驾驶行为的立法现状,主要介绍国内外对醉酒驾驶行为的处罚机制,并在立法上进行比较。第三章,醉酒驾驶行为入罪后的社会效果与司法困境。这一部分主要论述了《刑法修正案(八)》.实施以来产生的影响和弊端,搜集了相关数据,以及实践中面临的问题,为第四章提出笔者的观点做基础。第四章,醉酒驾驶行为不应入罪,这一部分,是整个文章的重点内容,笔者针对上文的相关数据和问题分析提出了自己观点。主要从我国犯罪圈的划定和刑罚配置的经济性原则以及刑罚目的角度进行论述。第五章,完善醉酒驾驶行为的处理模式,从行政立法出发,加强行政管理是对醉酒驾驶行为的最好规制。第六章是结语,再次总结了笔者的观点,即醉酒驾驶不应入罪。
[Abstract]:Although the Criminal Law Amendment (8) has clearly defined drunken driving as a crime, the debate on the appropriateness of drunk driving has not stopped. The author always holds a negative opinion on this argument. Since the two years of drunken driving, its social effect has changed from significant to slightly rising, and its judicial predicament has not been improved. These phenomena are all doubts about the rationality of drunken driving. Punishment is not the most appropriate way to punish drunk driving, nor is it the last way to prevent alcohol driving. From the point of view of the principle of modesty of criminal law and the economic principle of penalty allocation, the crime of alcohol driving is the manifestation of wasting criminal law resources. On the other hand, different from foreign countries, our country adopts qualitative and quantitative criteria for the delineation of crime circle, but the penalty of alcohol driving does not meet this standard. Therefore, we can not blindly learn from foreign legislation, should start from the actual situation of our country, re-consider the crime of alcohol driving. The article is divided into six chapters. The first chapter, introduction, introduces the purpose and significance of this paper, and explains the research status and methods. The second chapter, the legislation status quo of drunken driving behavior, mainly introduces the domestic and foreign punishment mechanism of drunk driving behavior, and carries on the comparison in the legislation. The third chapter, the social effect and the judicial predicament after the drunken driving behavior incriminates. This part mainly discusses the Criminal Law Amendment (8). The influence and malpractice since the implementation, the collection of relevant data, as well as the problems faced in practice, is the basis of the author's point of view in the fourth chapter. The fourth chapter, drunken driving behavior should not be criminalized, this part, is the focus of the whole article, the author of the above related data and analysis of the problems put forward their own views. This paper mainly discusses the economic principle and the purpose of penalty in the delineation of crime circle and penalty allocation in our country. The fifth chapter, perfect the handling mode of drunken driving behavior, from the administrative legislation, strengthen the administrative management is the best regulation of drunken driving behavior. The sixth chapter is the conclusion, again summarizes the author's view, that drunk driving should not be criminalized.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.32

【参考文献】