间接故意未遂问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-20 19:36

本文选题：间接故意 + 承接理论　；参考：《中国青年政治学院》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：间接故意犯罪是否具有未遂成立的可能性是一个同时具有理论价值与实践价值的问题:第一,在理论上,刑法第14条在间接故意犯罪的规定中使用了“放任”、“放任这种结果发生”这样的表述;刑法第23条关于犯罪未遂的规定中使用了“未得逞”一词,根据一般理解,“未得逞”是指没有实现行为人的主观目的,需要行为人的主观意志具有鲜明的结果指向性,而“放任”是指行为人对结果的发生漠不关心,不具有鲜明的结果指向性,所以间接故意的意志因素不符合未遂的成立条件,而且刑法第14条是关于间接故意犯罪的规定而不是间接故意的直接规定,在法条的表述中使用的是“放任这种结果发生”而不是“放任这种结果不发生”,所以,间接故意犯罪根据法条的字面意思均是结果犯,结果是间接故意犯罪成立的必备要件,所以,间接故意犯罪没有未遂。然而,根据故意的统一性原则,直接故意有未遂,间接故意与直接故意具有同样的结构,因此,对于间接故意未遂成立的可能性在理论上有研究的必要;第二,在实践中,有些案件根据间接故意未遂否定论无法处理,会导致在有些案件中行为虽然未造成实际的损害,但是由于行为对法益造成了紧迫的侵害危险,这样的行为根据间接故意未遂否定论只能是按照无罪处理,但是这些行为造成的危险已经可以构成刑法独立的评价对象了,所以在有些案件中承认间接故意犯罪有未遂成立的可能性对于司法实践具有重要的意义。关于这一问题国内学者主要有肯定论与否定论两种观点。笔者主张间接故意犯罪在有些案件中具有未遂成立的可能性,并且提出了判断间接故意未遂成立的标准,即根据行为有没有给刑法保护的法益造成了紧迫的具体危险,在此基础上对间接故意犯罪案件进行了具体的分类,使用上述提出的标准对三类间接故意的案件进行了具体分析,指出存在未遂的间接故意案件,弥补了间接故意犯罪未遂否定论在间接故意犯罪案件处理上的漏洞。
[Abstract]:The possibility of the attempted establishment of an indirect intentional crime is a problem with both theoretical and practical values. First, in theory, the fourteenth article of criminal law uses "laissez faire" in the provisions of indirect intentional crime and the expression of "letting this result happen"; the twenty-third article of criminal law is used in the provisions of the attempted crime. According to general understanding, "failure to succeed" means that the subjective purpose of the actor is not realized, and that the subjective will of the actor has a distinct result directivity, and "laissez faire" means that the actor is indifferent to the result, and does not have a clear direction of the result, so the indirect intentional will factor is not consistent. In addition, the fourteenth article of the criminal law is the direct provision of indirect intentional crime, not the indirect intention. In the expression of the law, it uses "letting go of this result" rather than "letting this result do not happen", so the literal meaning of indirect intentional offense is the result offense according to the literal meaning of the law. It is an essential element of the establishment of indirect intentional crime. Therefore, indirect intentional crime has not been attempted. However, according to the principle of intentional unity, there is a direct intentional attempt, indirect intention and direct intent have the same structure. Therefore, the possibility of the indirect intent to be unaccomplished is theoretically necessary; second, in practice, some cases It can not be dealt with on the basis of an attempted indirect intention of indirect intent, which leads to no actual damage in some cases, but because the act has caused urgent damage to the legal interests, such behavior can only be dealt with according to the innocence, but the danger caused by these acts can be made up. In some cases, it is important to admit the possibility of the attempted establishment of indirect intentional crime for judicial practice in some cases. There are two main points of view on the issue of affirmative and negative on this issue. The author advocates the possibility of unaccomplished establishment in some cases. And put forward the standard to judge the unaccomplished indirect intention, that is, according to whether the act has caused the urgent and concrete danger to the legal interest of the criminal law. On this basis, the indirect intentional crime is categorization, and the three kinds of indirect intentional cases are analyzed with the above standard, pointing out that there is an attempt. The indirect intentional case has made up for the flaw in the indirect intentional crime attempt.
【学位授予单位】：中国青年政治学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1

【参考文献】