一个标签理论的现实化进路:刑法谦抑性的司法适用

发布时间：2018-05-20 19:46

本文选题：刑法谦抑性 + 刑法效益最大化　；参考：《法制与社会发展》2017年03期

【摘要】：从限缩犯罪的良好初衷出发的刑法谦抑性理论正逐步被演绎成为缺乏操作性的"标签理论"。作为刑法理念的谦抑性,隐含于刑罚规范形成与适用的始终,指引着刑事立法与司法的内在操作,但不可直接作为裁判依据或者是解释规则。刑法谦抑理念体现的是对刑法效益最大化的追求,将谦抑理念更加规范、具体地引入解释方法之中可较好地发挥其理论价值。具体来说,谦抑性的介入程度与法益的重要性成反比,与法益的自我保护可能性成正比。通过对刑罚规范中核心法益的还原、具化,刑法谦抑性可以为限缩解释提供正当性的支持或者作为扩大解释的反思工具来检验刑法解释结论的妥当性,从而在解释论的立场上实现刑法谦抑理念的坚守。谦抑性的司法适用不仅应注意与有利于被告人原则的区分,还必须受到罪刑法定原则的制约。
[Abstract]:The theory of modesty of criminal law, which is based on the good intention of restricting crime, is gradually being deduce into the "label theory" which lacks operability. As the modesty of the concept of criminal law, it is implied in the formation and application of penal norms, guiding the internal operation of criminal legislation and judicature, but not directly as the basis of adjudication or the interpretation of rules. The modest concept of criminal law embodies the pursuit of maximizing the benefit of criminal law. It can give full play to its theoretical value by introducing it into the interpretation method. Specifically, the degree of modest intervention is inversely proportional to the importance of legal interest and directly proportional to the possibility of self-protection of legal interest. Through the reduction of the core legal interests in the penalty norms, the modesty of the criminal law can provide support for the justification of the restrictive interpretation or serve as a reflective tool to expand the interpretation to test the appropriateness of the conclusion of the interpretation of the criminal law. In order to explain the position of the implementation of the concept of modesty in criminal law. The judicial application of modesty should not only be distinguished from the principle of favorable defendant, but also be restricted by the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会青年项目“非法经营罪定罪量刑实证研究”(CLS(2015)Y05) 国家留学基金委高水平大学公派研究生项目(201606360169)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D914

【相似文献】