当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

骗取出境证件罪研究

发布时间:2018-05-23 13:57

  本文选题:研究 + 完善 ; 参考:《中国海洋大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:骗取出境证件罪是97年刑法修订时增加的罪名,该罪名的设立为打击近年来日益突出的涉证型偷渡犯罪起到了非常重要的作用。然而由于受当时立法条件的局限,该刑法条文的规定存在着不尽完善的方面,特别是随着形势的发展,司法实践中对该罪的犯罪构成、罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪的界限等方面都产生了较大的争议,实践中对个案的处理也不尽一致。因此笔者试图结合司法实践中的典型案例对上述争议问题做深入探讨,以期在理论上有所突破与创新,为指导骗取出境证件罪的司法实践、完善骗取出境证件罪的立法贡献微薄之力。本文共分四章对骗取出境证件罪进行系统研究。第一章骗取出境证件罪概述,笔者就我国和国际出入境证件制度和骗取出境证件罪的概念和立法沿革等问题作概要论述。首先介绍了我国和国际出入境证件制度,指出护照和签证是出入境的主要证件,并与此相适应形成了护照制度和签证制度两大法律制度。其次论述了骗取出境证件罪从无到有的立法演变过程。第二章骗取出境证件罪的犯罪构成,论述了骗取出境证件罪的犯罪客观方面、犯罪客体、犯罪主体、犯罪主观方面四个要件。首先对各构成要件的内容进行了阐述,其次对如何正确理解刑法第319条中的“其他名义”、“弄虚作假”的犯罪手段、“暗渡陈仓”式组织偷渡中的骗取出境证件行为及“为组织他人偷越国(边)境使用”的要件属性等问题进行了研究。第三章系统论述了骗取出境证件罪的罪与非罪,骗取出境证件罪与组织他人偷越国(边)境罪、诈骗罪、出售出境证件罪的区别以及犯罪既遂与犯罪未遂的认定等问题。第四章骗取出境证件罪的立法完善。指出我国刑法第319条尚不够完善,存在缺陷主要在罪状表述方面,即犯罪对象、犯罪方式、犯罪目的方面,建议将犯罪对象由“出境证件”改为“出入境证件”,犯罪方式的规定取消,将“为组织他人偷越国(边)境”的犯罪目的改为“为他人出入境使用”。
[Abstract]:The crime of defrauding the exit certificate was added when the Criminal Law was revised in 1997. The establishment of the crime has played a very important role in cracking down on the increasingly prominent crime of illegal immigration involving evidence in recent years. However, due to the limitation of the legislative conditions at that time, the provisions of the article of the criminal law are not perfect, especially with the development of the situation, the constitution of the crime, the crime and the non-crime in the judicial practice. The boundary between this crime and that crime has produced great controversy, and the handling of the case is not consistent in practice. Therefore, the author tries to make a thorough discussion on the above controversial issues in combination with typical cases in judicial practice, in order to make a breakthrough and innovation in theory, in order to guide the judicial practice of the crime of deceiving exit documents. Perfecting the legislation of the crime of defrauding exit documents contributes meagre. This paper is divided into four chapters to systematically study the crime of defrauding exit documents. The first chapter is an overview of the crime of defrauding exit documents. The author makes a brief discussion on the system of entry and exit documents and the concept and legislative evolution of the crime of defrauding exit documents in our country and in the world. This paper first introduces the system of entry and exit documents of our country and international countries, points out that passport and visa are the main documents of entry and exit, and forms two legal systems of passport system and visa system. Secondly, it discusses the legislative evolution of the crime of defrauding exit documents from scratch. The second chapter discusses the criminal constitution of the crime of defrauding exit documents, discusses the objective aspects of crime, the object of crime and the subjective aspect of crime. First of all, it expounds the contents of each constituent element, and secondly, it discusses how to correctly understand the criminal means of "other names" and "fraud" in Article 319 of the Criminal Law. This paper studies the behavior of obtaining exit certificate by cheating in the illegal immigration of "secret crossing Chen Cang" organization and the essential elements attribute of "organizing other people to use the border of the country (border)" and so on. The third chapter systematically discusses the crime and non-crime of defrauding exit document, the crime of deceptive exit document and the crime of organizing others to cross the border of the country (border), the crime of fraud, the distinction between the crime of selling exit document and the identification of accomplished crime and attempted crime, etc. Chapter IV the legislative perfection of the crime of defrauding exit documents. It is pointed out that Article 319 of the Criminal Law of our country is not perfect, and its defects are mainly in the aspects of the description of the crime, that is, the object of the crime, the way of the crime, and the purpose of the crime. It is suggested that the object of the crime be changed from "exit document" to "exit document". The crime mode is abolished and the criminal purpose of "organizing others to cross the border" is changed to "use for the entry and exit of others".
【学位授予单位】:中国海洋大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 孟庆华;骗取出境证件罪的几个司法认定问题探讨[J];江西公安专科学校学报;2004年01期

2 陈毅坚;;短缩二行为犯的竞合:以骗取出境证件罪为例[J];西部法学评论;2010年05期

3 马勇;;如何认定钱明的罪行[J];出国与就业;2000年12期

4 ;最高人民法院关于审理组织、运送他人偷越国(边)境等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释[J];中华人民共和国最高人民法院公报;2002年02期

5 曹晓烨;蔡永彤;;妨害国(边)境管理罪疑难问题研究[J];河南公安高等专科学校学报;2009年04期

6 曲肖彬;;一个偷渡团伙的覆灭[J];检察风云;2006年17期

7 卢劲杉;;检眼破击“包装”偷渡[J];检察风云;2011年03期

8 潘京;;组团出国乞讨的老人[J];晚报文萃;2013年12期

9 汤海军;;中国偷渡犯罪刑事立法之反思[J];公民与法(法学版);2010年04期

10 ;合法腐败——透视监外执行中的司法黑洞[J];东西南北;2004年06期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 张秋波;;论妨害国(边)境管理犯罪中的几个问题[A];21世纪出入境(移民)管理研讨会论文集[C];2008年

相关重要报纸文章 前9条

1 赵新宇;以旅游等名义滞留国外应否定罪[N];检察日报;2007年

2 北京市检察院 庞静;为多人编造材料骗取签证如何定性[N];检察日报;2008年

3 通讯员 刘维翔;网上发消息帮人办护照[N];检察日报;2011年

4 陈平建 熊理思;瞒骗同伙干“私活” 是否“共犯”惹争议[N];法治快报;2007年

5 本报记者 张慧鹏 本报通讯员 曹志明;摧毁出境“旅游”陷阱[N];人民法院报;2003年

6 张松涛;伪造文件骗签证助人出国牟暴利[N];法治快报;2007年

7 徐德高 李平;办理偷渡案件:问题与对策[N];检察日报;2004年

8 ;最高人民法院公告[N];检察日报;2002年

9 关琳琳 李同安;藁城市法院依法审判一起组织42人偷越国(边)境案[N];河北经济日报;2005年

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 孙立强;骗取出境证件罪研究[D];中国海洋大学;2014年

2 刘德军;我国妨害国(边)境管理罪立法之缺憾与完善[D];中国政法大学;2007年



本文编号:1925011

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1925011.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7b5b0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com