风险刑法理论下抽象危险犯的合理规制

发布时间：2018-05-24 11:10

本文选题：风险刑法 + 抽象危险犯　；参考：《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年02期

【摘要】：伴随风险社会理论的产生,在刑法学界提出了风险刑法理论,以预防风险为目的的处罚的早期化是显著特征。而在风险刑法理论背景下,又出现了扩大抽象危险犯的主张。尽管表面上看二者似乎有一种理论上的支撑关系,但实际上各自有其独立的社会基础,只是这种独立的社会基础表现出了高度的契合性。因此,作为最严厉的制裁手段,刑法应当以谦抑为精神,其保障法的地位不能动摇。当然,不能否认社会危险的增多,但又不能以此为借口盲目扩大抽象危险犯的处罚,应该持理性而冷静的态度,从现实出发,从刑法保障人的利益的视角考虑,尽量借鉴该理论与国情符合的方面来解决我国的实际问题,适时地、合理地肯定抽象危险犯在我国刑法中的独特的价值和功能,并进行合理规制。
[Abstract]:With the emergence of the theory of risk society, the theory of risk criminal law has been put forward in the field of criminal law, and the early punishment aimed at preventing risk is a remarkable feature. Under the background of the theory of risk criminal law, there appears the idea of expanding abstract dangerous crime. Although on the surface they seem to have a theoretical support relationship, in fact, each has its own independent social basis, but this independent social foundation shows a high degree of compatibility. Therefore, as the most severe means of punishment, the criminal law should take modesty as the spirit, and the position of its safeguard law cannot be shaken. Of course, we can't deny the increase of social danger, but we can't use this as an excuse to blindly expand the punishment of abstract dangerous crime. We should take a rational and calm attitude, proceed from reality and consider from the angle of criminal law to protect the interests of people. This paper tries to use this theory for reference to solve the practical problems of our country, to confirm the unique value and function of abstract dangerous crime in our criminal law, and to regulate it reasonably.
【作者单位】：兰州大学法学院;
【分类号】：D914

【相似文献】