选择性罪名中罪数问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-26 00:53

本文选题：选择性罪名 + 罪数判断　；参考：《南昌大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：选择性罪名是一种特殊的罪名,在我国罪名体系中占有重要位置。然而我国立法未对选择性罪名作出明确规定,再加上刑法理论研究的不足,导致司法实践对选择性罪名适用不统一,尤其是罪数判断问题。本文试图在评析选择性罪名各罪数学说的基础上,通过对比、归纳的方法提出法益重合性是选择性罪名罪数判断的标准。法益重合性判断标准是指行为所侵犯的法益是否具有重合性。行为人实施选择性罪名中的数行为,所侵犯法益具有重合性,则只构成一罪;反之,则构成数罪。法益重合性判断标准能够贯彻全面评价原则和禁止重复评价原则,且具有可操作性。因此对统一司法实践中选择性罪名的罪数判断具有重要意义。全文主要包括三部分,具体如下:第一部分和第二部分主要是对我国刑法学界中关于选择性罪名罪数学说的归纳概括及评析。刑法学界关于选择性罪名罪数学说的观点主要有三种:一罪说、数罪说、折衷说。其中,根据不同的划分标准,折衷说可以形成三种不同的观点:第一,以案件是否属于同一宗案件为标准;第二,以是否符合罪刑相适应原则为标准;第三,以行为人实施的数行为之间是否存在内在联系性为标准。本文主张折衷说,但以法益重合性为划分标准,即行为所侵害的法益是否具有重合性是行为是构成一罪还是构成数罪的判断标准。第三部分是本文的核心,在分析各罪数判断标准学说的基础之上提出本文认为较为科学的新的选择性罪名罪数判断的标准,即法益重合性判断标准,并对该新的罪数判断标准进行论证,明确法益重合性应满足的条件,最后将该判断标准具体运用到选择性罪名中的罪数判断中,归纳出行为人实施选择性罪名中的行为构成一罪情形与数罪情形。
[Abstract]:Selective charge is a special charge, which plays an important role in our country's crime system. However, the legislation of our country has not made a clear stipulation on the selective charge, coupled with the insufficiency of the study of the theory of criminal law, which leads to the disunity of the judicial practice in the application of the selective charge, especially the problem of judging the number of the crimes. On the basis of analyzing the mathematical theory of each crime of selective charge, this paper proposes that the coincidence of legal interests is the criterion of judging the number of crimes of selective charge by means of comparison and induction. The criterion of law benefit coincidence is whether the law interest violated by the act has coincidence. When the actor carries out several acts in the selective charge, the infringed legal interest is superimposed, which constitutes only one crime; otherwise, it constitutes a number of crimes. The criterion of coincidence of law benefit can carry out the principle of comprehensive evaluation and prohibition of repeated evaluation, and it is operable. Therefore, it is of great significance to judge the number of selective charges in unified judicial practice. The full text mainly includes three parts, as follows: the first part and the second part are the summary and evaluation of the mathematical theory of the crime of selective charge in the criminal law circle of our country. There are three kinds of views on the mathematical theory of selective charge in criminal law field: one crime theory, several crimes theory and compromise theory. Among them, according to different criteria of division, the compromise theory can form three different views: first, whether the case belongs to the same case as the criterion; second, whether it conforms to the principle of the adaptation of crime and punishment; and thirdly, The criterion is whether the number of acts carried out by the actor is interlinked. This paper argues for compromise, but the criterion is based on the coincidence of legal interests, that is, whether the legal interest violated by an act has coincidence is the criterion of whether the act constitutes a crime or a number of crimes. The third part is the core of this paper. On the basis of analyzing the theory of the judgment standard of the number of crimes, this paper puts forward a new criterion of judging the number of crimes of selective charge, that is, the criterion of coincidence of legal interests, which is considered to be more scientific in this paper. And the new judgment standard of the number of crimes is demonstrated, and the conditions that should be satisfied by the coincidence of legal interests are made clear. Finally, the criterion is applied to the judgment of the number of crimes in the selective charge. The author concludes that the behavior constitutes a crime and several crimes in the implementation of selective charges.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】