二元行为无价值论的合理性

发布时间：2018-05-25 19:11

本文选题：行为无价值 + 结果无价值　；参考：《上海师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文从行为无价值论和结果无价值论的分歧入手主耍讨论了..元行为无价值论的积极意义。本文分为六大部分。第一部分是绪论。第二部分是介绍行为无价值论和结果无价值论的概念和法展脉络：行为无价值论，也可称为人的违法论（或人的不法论）。单纯从违法的角度而言，，行为无价值的核心观点是，在考察是否存在实质的违法性时，重视行为人的意思这种“人的”要素。其中，完全不考虑法益侵害及其危险，仅将行为人的‘‘意思”作为违法性判断基础的立场，可谓“一元的人的违法论”或者“主观的一元的行为无价值论”；不仅将行为人的“意思”，而且将法益侵害及其危险也作为违法性判断基础的立场，可谓：元的违法论”或者‘‘：：元行为无价值论”。第三部分，从犯罪构成理论的发展趋势来说明二元行为无价值论更符合现代犯罪构成理论的发展趋势及主观要素成为犯罪构成要件成为主流。第四部分，从犯罪构成要件角度来探究.：元行为无价值论。分为客观要素和主观要素两部分内容，客观要素方面主要介绍了行为、结果和因果关系。主观要素方面主要包含了故意和过失两部分内容。第五部分，主要介绍用二元行为无价值论更有利于违法性判断。犯罪的实体是违法与责任，责任是对违法的贵任，因而不能脱离违法而存在。但是，违法的存在不依赖责任。另一方面，对违法性的理解不同必然会导致对责任的理解不同。行为无价值论S结果无价值论源于对违法性认识上的分歧，那么该部分是本文的重点章节。本部分主要从违法性论的哲学基础、违法性判断中违法性的判断资料、违法性的判断时点以及二元的行为无价值对违法阻却事由的合理性还有用二元的行为无价值的观点的应用：主要用来解释偶然防卫的合理性、对物的防卫的合理性。最后一部分内容是对未遂犯问题的研究讨论，从未遂犯着手的认定方面的合理性，到用二元的行为无价值对危险的判断来区分未遂犯与不能犯。
[Abstract]:This article starts with the difference between the theory of behavior and the theory of result without value. Meta-behavior has no positive significance of value theory. This paper is divided into six parts. The first part is the introduction. The second part is an introduction to the concept of "act without value" and "result without value" and the development of law: the theory of behavior without value can also be called "illegality" (or "illegality" of human being). From the point of view of illegality, the core point of the worthless behavior is to attach importance to the "human" element of the meaning of the perpetrator when examining the existence of substantive illegality. Among them, completely do not consider the legal interest infringement and its danger, only regard the actor's' meaning "as the illegal judgment basis, can be described as" the person's illegality theory "or" the subjective monistic behavior has no value theory "; Not only the "meaning" of the doer, but also the legal interest infringement and its danger are taken as the basis of the judgment of illegality, which can be described as "Yuan's illegality" or ": there is no value of meta-behavior. In the third part, from the development trend of the theory of crime constitution, it is shown that the theory of dualistic behavior without value is more in line with the development trend of modern theory of constitution of crime and that the subjective elements become the mainstream of the constitutive elements of crime. The fourth part, from the point of view of the elements of crime, to explore the meta-behavior without value. It is divided into two parts: objective elements and subjective elements. Objective elements mainly introduce behavior, result and causality. Subjective elements mainly include intentional and negligent content. In the fifth part, the author mainly introduces that it is more advantageous to judge illegality by using dualistic theory of non-value. The entity of crime is illegal and responsible, and responsibility is the duty of illegality, so it cannot exist without breaking the law. However, the existence of violations does not depend on responsibility. On the other hand, different understanding of illegality will inevitably lead to different understanding of responsibility. The behavioral nonaxiology S result nonaxiology originates from the difference on the understanding of illegality, so this part is the key chapter of this paper. This part is mainly based on the philosophical basis of illegality theory, the judgment data of illegality in illegality judgment, The judgment of illegality and the reasonableness of dualistic behavior to the reason of obstruction of law, and the application of the viewpoint that dualistic behavior is worthless: mainly used to explain the rationality of accidental defense and the reasonableness of material defense. The last part is the research and discussion on the problem of attempted crime, from the rationality of the identification of attempted crime to the judgment of danger by dualistic behavior.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】