论量刑因果关系的司法证明——刑事一体化的视角

发布时间：2018-05-25 19:09

本文选题：刑事法治 + 量刑　；参考：《证据科学》2016年02期

【摘要】：量刑因果关系是刑法因果关系中的一个重要方面。在刑事法治中,量刑应当同定罪一样受到同等的重视。本文从量刑因果关系的刑事整体性研究入手,从刑法和刑诉法的角度对其进行审视与判断。在微观正义论和司法复杂性的原理和要求下,量刑因果关系的证明要素被分为说明性的证明要素和假设性的证明要素。这两种证明要素在具体的证明路径和过程要求中存在差别。量刑因果关系的证明主体存在多样化特征。量刑因果关系的证明责任在证明标准的特殊背景下,更加注重检察官与被告人的不同角色要求。
[Abstract]:Sentencing causality is an important aspect of criminal law causality. In the criminal rule of law, sentencing should receive the same attention as conviction. This article starts with the study of the criminal integrity of sentencing causality, and examines and judges it from the angle of criminal law and criminal procedure law. Under the principle and requirement of micro justice theory and judicial complexity, the proof elements of sentencing causality can be divided into illustrative proof elements and hypothetical proof elements. These two kinds of proof elements are different in the concrete proof path and the process requirement. The proof subject of sentencing causality has diversified characteristics. Under the special background of the standard of proof, the burden of proof of sentencing causality pays more attention to the different roles of prosecutor and defendant.
【作者单位】：西南财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“司法改革与我国刑事证据制度完善”(项目编号:11AFX015) 笔者主持的中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金“为什么是方法——论刑事司法改革整合方法”(项目编号:JBK1607113)资助
【分类号】：D914

【相似文献】