编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪的认定
发布时间:2018-05-26 09:37
本文选题:编造 + 故意传播 ; 参考:《沈阳师范大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百九十一条所规定的罪名是:“聚众扰乱公共场所秩序、交通秩序罪;投放虚假危险物质罪;编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪”,在此罪中的第二款有明确的规定:“编造爆炸威胁、生化威胁、放射威胁等恐怖信息,,或者明知是编造的恐怖信息而故意传播,严重扰乱社会秩序的,处五年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制;造成严重后果的,处五年以上有期徒刑。”编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪立法的原本意思是为了有效的打压猖狂的恐怖犯罪,但是现如今随着社会多样化的出现,却偏离了最初的航向,向着规制社会公众秩序的方向发展。编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息的行为特别容易引起人群的恐慌,让人们的心理产生不安,使社会安定有序的状态变得特别的混乱,甚至严重的危及到公民财产的所有权和人身的安全。本篇文章通过对一系列案例进行剖析,对有关的法律问题进行深入的思考,以使编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪在刑法中更好的发挥作用。 本篇文章主要通过案例分析法、实证分析法,比较分析法等一系列研究方法主要从以下四个方面对编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪的构成进行了分析:首先通过对王文泽编造传播“明天要炸上海浦东机场”短信案的一些焦点问题进行分析来对何为“编造”以及何为“故意传播”进行认定,并明确了本罪的主观方面。其次通过对林晓燕案中的一些焦点问题进行分析,剖析出何为“虚假”信息以及何为“恐怖”信息,从而对虚假恐怖信息的认定进行了详细的阐述。然后又要通过李宗民案来说明什么样的行为构成“严重扰乱社会秩序”,达到何种程度可称为“严重”。最后通过对冯玉鹏编造虚假恐怖信息勒索钱财案说明了达到何种程度才属于“造成严重后果”,主要通过对案例进行分析来阐明了什么样的后果才是严重后果。 通过上述几个典型案例的分析,编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪构罪的条件及定罪量刑的适用将变得更加明确。
[Abstract]:The crimes stipulated in Article 291 of the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China are: "the crime of gathering a crowd to disturb the order of public places and traffic order; the crime of putting in false dangerous substances; and the crime of fabricating and deliberately disseminating false terrorist information", In the second paragraph of this crime, there is a clear provision: "whoever fabricates terrorist information such as explosive threat, biological threat, radiological threat, or knowingly disseminates the fabricated terrorist information, and seriously disrupts public order, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years," Criminal detention or public surveillance; if serious consequences are caused, the offender shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years. " The original intention of the legislation on the crime of fabricating and deliberately disseminating false terrorist information was to effectively suppress rampant terrorist crimes, but now with the emergence of social diversity, it has deviated from its original course. Towards the direction of regulation of public order. The act of fabricating and deliberately disseminating false terrorist information is particularly apt to cause panic among the crowd, make people's psychology uneasy, and make the social stability and order become particularly chaotic. Even seriously endangers the citizen's property ownership and personal safety. Through the analysis of a series of cases, this article makes a deep reflection on the relevant legal issues in order to make the crime of fabricating and deliberately disseminating false terrorist information play a better role in the criminal law. This article mainly through the case analysis method, the empirical analysis method, the comparative analysis method and so on a series of research methods mainly from the following four aspects to fabricate, This paper analyzes the constitution of the crime of intentionally disseminating false terrorist information: firstly, by analyzing some focal issues in the SMS case of "bombing Shanghai Pudong Airport tomorrow" made up by Wang Wenze, the author analyzes what is "fabrication" and what is it. "intentional communication" for identification, The subjective aspect of the crime is clarified. Secondly, through the analysis of some focal issues in Lin Xiaoyan case, the author analyzes what is "false" information and what is "terror" information, and then expounds the identification of false terrorist information in detail. Then, through the case of Li Zongmin, we should explain what kind of behavior constitutes "serious disturbance of social order" and to what extent it can be called "serious". In the end, Feng Yupeng's case of fabricating false terrorist information to extort money and money shows the degree of "causing serious consequences", mainly through the case analysis to clarify what kind of consequences are serious consequences. Through the analysis of several typical cases mentioned above, the conditions of the crime of intentionally spreading false terrorist information and the application of conviction and sentencing will become clearer.
【学位授予单位】:沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李博宇;和谐社会须以理性为基[J];人民公安;2005年09期
2 李洪川;论投放虚假危险物质罪[J];法律适用;2003年10期
3 李钧德;上访该不该被判刑 河南省唐河县五名上访村民被判刑的调查[J];w
本文编号:1936752
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1936752.html