被害人怀疑对诈骗罪认定影响研究

发布时间：2018-05-26 18:09

本文选题：认识错误 + 被害人怀疑　；参考：《中国刑事法杂志》2015年06期

【摘要】：欺骗的内容包括过去、现在和将来的事实以及价值判断等,采取同类一般人的标准,对十分简单、拙劣的虚假表示行为可以认定为欺骗行为。传统理论和司法实践认为被害人怀疑不影响对诈骗罪的认定,但被害人信条学认为,被害人已经对诈骗事项产生了"具体怀疑",可以轻易实现自我保护却任意处分财产,就丧失了刑法保护的必要性。本文从自我决定权出发,运用被害人自我答责来解决被害人怀疑对诈骗罪认定的影响。被害人有"具体怀疑"时,运用危险接受法理对诈骗罪成立范围进行限缩;再根据谨慎注意义务的有无,将诈骗发生领域划分为无需谨慎注意义务的一般生活领域和应当具有谨慎注意义务的市场、投资、投机和违法领域,对前者实行无差别的、严格的保护,对后者适用被害人自我答责,从而在限缩的基础上适当扩大诈骗罪的处罚范围。
[Abstract]:The content of deception includes past present and future facts as well as value judgment and so on. It can be regarded as deceptive to very simple and clumsy false representation by adopting the standard of the same kind of general person. The traditional theory and judicial practice hold that the victim's suspicion does not affect the determination of the crime of fraud, but the victim's creed believes that the victim has already had "specific doubts" about the fraud, and can easily achieve self-protection but dispose of property arbitrarily. The necessity of criminal law protection is lost. Starting from self-decision, this paper uses victim self-responsibility to solve the influence of victim's doubt on fraud crime. When the victim has "specific suspicion", the scope of the crime of fraud is limited by using the legal principle of acceptance of danger, and then according to the duty of care whether there is a duty of care or not, Dividing the field of fraud into general areas of life where the duty of care is not required and markets that should have the duty of care, investment, speculation and lawbreaking, with the former being protected without distinction or strict protection, To the latter, the victim's self-responsibilityshould be applied to enlarge the punishment range of the crime of fraud on the basis of constriction.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;湖北省荆门市东宝区人民检察院;
【分类号】：D924.35

【共引文献】