对“醉驾”免刑实践的检视和理性证立——以某省五年判决为样本

发布时间：2018-05-27 14:42

本文选题：“醉驾”型危险驾驶罪 + 免予刑事处罚　；参考：《社会科学研究》2017年05期

【摘要】：在定罪基础上,免刑(免予刑事处罚)是与判刑相对应的刑事处遇。当前"醉驾"实践呈现出案件数量逐年上升但免刑比例偏低,刑罚投入巨大而刑罚效益却无明显改观的面相。重刑主义的盛行、理论的分歧和司法机制和环境是掣肘"醉驾"免刑实践的诸多因素,而顺应司法现代化要求、缩减刑罚化的负效应和对抽象危险犯的妥协性正义,要求扩大"醉驾"免刑实践。扩大免刑实践需要根据刑法第37条的"情节轻微"和"不需要判处刑罚"两个方面量刑情节进行实质性和系统性解读,并完善文书说理以搭建"醉驾"免刑司法综合实践平台。
[Abstract]:On the basis of conviction, commutation (exemption from criminal punishment) is the corresponding criminal punishment. At present, the practice of "drunk driving" shows that the number of cases increases year by year, but the proportion of impunity is on the low side, and the penalty investment is huge but the penalty benefit is not obviously improved. The prevalence of severe punishment, the divergence of theory and the judicial mechanism and environment are the factors that restrict the practice of "drunk driving", and conform to the request of judicial modernization, reduce the negative effect of penalty and compromise justice to the abstract dangerous crime. Demands to expand the practice of "drunk driving" exemption from punishment. In order to expand the practice of exemption from punishment, it is necessary to carry out substantive and systematic interpretation of the circumstances of sentencing in terms of "minor circumstances" and "no penalty" in Article 37 of the Criminal Law, and to perfect the reasoning of documents in order to set up a comprehensive practical platform for judicial practice of "drunk driving".
【作者单位】：四川大学法学院;四川省高级人民法院;
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】