刑法中的职业禁止问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-28 09:38

本文选题：职业禁止 + 立法背景　；参考：《天津师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在中国经济迅猛发展的当下,实施与职业相关的犯罪案件屡见不鲜,更有甚者,有些实施与职业相关犯罪行为而被判处刑罚的犯罪分子,在刑罚执行完毕或者假释之后,重新回归到社会中又重操旧业,再次走上犯罪的道路,进而严重侵害社会大众的切身利益,给社会的发展与稳定带来高度的危险性。这种重操旧业实施违法犯罪行为严重威胁社会大众的生命和财产安全的行为,自然引起了社会的高度关注。在这种社会背景之下,《刑法修正案(九)》中第1条规定了该措施。由于该条款是新入刑法,职业禁止条文的含义、性质以及适用条件尚需进一步明确。比如,刑法典第37条之一规定的内容中指出的"假释之日"中是指裁定假释之日还是送达假释裁定之日?"刑罚"包含范围是全部还是部分主刑和附加刑?诸如此类问题都应一一进行深入阐释。不仅如此,该措施在适用过程中还可能面临诸多疑难问题,需要运用法学理论知识加以解决。为了更好地发挥该措施的法律价值,以期达至预防再犯罪的作用,实现立法者所追求的社会防卫效果,从刑事法律层面维护好社会稳定与繁荣,针对可能出现的问题提出合理化的建议,为司法机关更好地适用该规定提供理论上的支持,甚或从理论层面为完善该措施提出一些思考,本文就职业禁止条款的立法背景,该措施的性质定位,职业禁止的适用原则,该措施的内涵及适用条件,该措施司法适用中的疑难问题,该条款的立法完善等问题进行了探讨。
[Abstract]:In the present period of rapid economic development in China, the practice of job-related crimes is not uncommon. What is more, some criminals who have been sentenced to punishment for committing career-related crimes have been sentenced to punishment after the execution of the penalty or the release of parole. Returning to the society and doing the old business again, and taking the road of crime again, it seriously infringes the vital interests of the public and brings a high degree of danger to the development and stability of the society. This serious threat to the life and property of the public caused great concern by the society. In this social context, Article 1 of the Criminal Law Amendment (IX) provides for this measure. As the article is a new criminal law, the meaning, nature and applicable conditions of the occupational prohibition provisions need to be further clarified. For example, in the context of article 37 bis of the Penal Code, "the date of parole" refers to the date of parole or the date of delivery of the parole order? " Does the scope of punishment include all or part of the main punishment and supplementary punishment? Such questions should be explained in depth one by one. Moreover, this measure may also face many difficult problems in the process of application, which need to be solved by using the knowledge of law theory. In order to give full play to the legal value of the measure in order to achieve the function of preventing recidivism, realize the social defense effect pursued by the legislator, and safeguard the social stability and prosperity from the criminal law level, In view of the possible problems, this paper puts forward some reasonable suggestions, provides theoretical support for the judicial organs to better apply the provisions, or even puts forward some thoughts from the theoretical level to perfect the measures, the legislative background of this article on the prohibition of employment. This paper discusses the nature and orientation of the measure, the application principle of the occupational prohibition, the connotation and the applicable conditions of the measure, the difficult problems in the judicial application of the measure, and the legislative perfection of the provision.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924

【相似文献】