论构建相对独立的量刑程序

发布时间：2018-05-28 19:10

本文选题：定罪程序 + 量刑程序　；参考：《河北法学》2017年01期

【摘要】：英美法系采取独立的量刑程序模式,大陆法系采取一体的量刑程序模式。二者差别表现在定罪与量刑中收集的信息是否高度重合、量刑程序是否适用无罪推定原则、定罪程序与量刑程序证明标准是否一致三方面。定罪程序与量刑程序不同的程序追求为定罪量刑程序分离提供了内在的依据和必要性,无罪推定原则则为定罪量刑程序分离提供了来自程序法的必要,而真正促使程序的分离从来理论走向实践的是,则是英美法系发达的证据法。从实际出发,中国现阶段更应当构建相对独立的量刑程序。因为中国不具有量刑程序独立存在的证据法条件和程序法条件。
[Abstract]:Anglo-American law system adopts the independent sentencing procedure model, while the continental law system adopts the integrated sentencing procedure model. The difference between the two shows whether the information collected in conviction and sentencing is highly consistent, whether the principle of presumption of innocence is applied in sentencing procedure, and whether the standard of proof of conviction and sentencing procedure is consistent. The pursuit of different procedure between conviction procedure and sentencing procedure provides the inherent basis and necessity for the separation of conviction and sentencing procedure, while the principle of presumption of innocence provides the necessity from procedural law for the separation of conviction and sentencing procedure. What really drives the separation of procedure from theory to practice is the developed evidence law in Anglo-American law system. Proceeding from reality, China should construct relatively independent sentencing procedure at the present stage. Because China does not have the evidence law condition and the procedure law condition which the sentencing procedure independently exists.
【作者单位】：广东真利律师事务所;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目《迈向制度理性的民事程序研究》(14CFX028)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】