“激愤杀人”立法研究
发布时间:2018-05-29 21:58
本文选题:激愤杀人 + 立法模式 ; 参考:《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年S1期
【摘要】:无论是基于社会的现实需要还是立足于刑法理论,增设"激愤杀人"的刑事立法已成为必然。本文在论证了立法必要性的前提下,就"激愤杀人"的立法模式、认定标准以及量刑配置等问题进行了剖析,并提出了具体的立法建议——通过修正案的方式在我国刑法第232条故意杀人罪条文中增加一款:"激愤杀人的,不适用死刑";并通过立法或者司法解释将"激愤杀人"认定为:由于被害人的严重过错而受到了强烈的精神刺激,行为人在绝望、暴怒等难以控制的激愤情绪状态下当场杀死被害人的行为。
[Abstract]:Whether it is based on the social needs or based on the criminal law theory, it has become inevitable to add the criminal legislation of "killing people with indignation". On the premise of demonstrating the necessity of legislation, this paper analyzes the legislative model, the standard of confirmation and the disposition of sentencing of "indignant murder". And put forward a specific legislative proposal-through the way of amendment to our country's criminal law in the 232 article of intentional homicide provisions added a paragraph: "indignant homicide," "do not apply the death penalty"; and, through legislation or judicial interpretation, regards "indignant murder" as a result of the victim's serious fault, which is strongly stimulated by the spirit, and the perpetrator is desperate, The act of killing a victim on the spot in a state of uncontrollable indignation.
【作者单位】: 华东政法大学法律学院;
【分类号】:D924.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 曲新久;论我国刑法中的简单罪状及其完善[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);1991年06期
2 陈明;赵宁;;简单罪状的司法认定和解释规则研究——以盗窃罪的司法认定为例[J];政治与法律;2013年04期
3 刘沛,
本文编号:1952575
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1952575.html