论教唆犯刑事责任的边界——以《刑法》第29条第2款为中心的展开

发布时间：2018-05-30 20:17

  本文选题：《刑法》第条第款 + 单一制　； 参考：《甘肃政法学院学报》2017年05期

【摘要】：确定教唆犯刑事责任边界的核心在于选择合理的共同犯罪体系,重点在于把握共同犯罪流程演化与因果关系变动。区分制与教唆犯从属性原则在教唆犯与实行正犯之间建立三重因果关系,确保了构成要件的定型性、违法的共同性与责任的个别化,是明确教唆犯刑事责任边界的前提。基于此,以《刑法》第29条第2款为主线,根据犯罪流程的演化及因果关系的变化可知:被教唆者的行为尚未进入预备阶段,不存在犯罪性问题,教唆者绝对不可罚;预备犯之教唆者相对可罚,为照应预备犯的处罚规则,应将《刑法》第29条第2款的处罚规则改为"可以从轻、减轻或者免除处罚";在被教唆者僭越共同犯罪合意的场合,应根据教唆之罪与被教唆者实行之罪在构成要件层面的关系来具体归责。
[Abstract]:The core of determining the boundary of criminal responsibility of abettor is to choose a reasonable joint crime system, and the emphasis is to grasp the evolution of joint crime process and the change of causality. The principle of subordination between the instigator and the instigator establishes a triple causal relationship between the abettor and the principal instigator, which ensures the formality of the constitutive elements, the commonality of the violation and the individualization of the responsibility, which is the premise of defining the boundary of the criminal responsibility of the abettor. Based on this, taking the second paragraph of Article 29 of the Criminal Law as the main line, according to the evolution of the crime process and the change of causality, we can know: the behavior of the abettee has not entered the preparatory stage, there is no criminal problem, and the abettor is absolutely not punished; The abettor of the preparatory offender may be punished relatively. In order to take care of the punishment rules of the preparatory offender, the penalty rule of Article 29 (2) of the Criminal Law shall be changed to "the punishment may be mitigated or exempted from punishment". According to the relationship between the crime of abetment and the crime committed by the instigator in the constitutive elements level, the specific imputation should be carried out.
【作者单位】： 东南大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目《刑法出罪机制问题研究》(项目编号:15YJA820015) 江苏省研究生创新人才培养基金项目《职务犯罪新动态及其预防机制研究》(项目编号:SJZZ15-0032)之阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D924.1
，

本文编号：1956629