醉酒型危险驾驶罪“醉酒”行为的证明规则研究

发布时间：2018-06-18 14:41

本文选题：醉酒 + 证明规则　；参考：《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：醉酒型危险驾驶罪作为刑法修正案（八）新增加的一项罪名，其立法目的是为了预防犯罪，维护社会公共安全。在司法实践中，该罪面临着各种各样的争议。本文从醉酒型危险驾驶罪的基本概况入手，阐述我国该罪入刑的背景及现有规定，同时介绍美国、德国等国家和台湾地区的相关立法，然后主要针对醉酒型危险驾驶罪中“醉酒”行为的证明规则进行研究，指出我国目前审判实践中对该罪在证据采信上的不足，采用对比分析、实证分析等方法进行讨论，认为我国目前的证明方式过于简单，审判人员仅根据血液中酒精含量的检测结果判断罪与非罪，违反了“疑罪从无”的刑法原则，可能会造成刑罚的滥用。因为血检结果具有先天的不足，主要是程序上的不够完善，醉酒并不等于80mg/100ml，该标准并不能完全准确的反映行为人的醉酒状态。最终本文认为醉酒型危险驾驶中“醉酒”行为的认定应当采用实质性判断的原则，即对“醉酒”的具体状态进行综合评价和证明。通过主观和客观相结合的方法，分别对醉驾嫌疑人进行现场清醒测试和血液中酒精含量测试，现场测试又分为意识状态、观察判断、操作控制三项能力的考察；同时对血液中酒精含量的标准设定一个范围，在该范围内，由司法人员进行自由裁量，允许法官结合具体案情进行综合判定，这样才能避免刑罚执行的差别化，，真正实现司法公正。
[Abstract]:The crime of drunken dangerous driving is a new crime in amendment (8) of Criminal Law, and its legislative purpose is to prevent crime and maintain public security. In judicial practice, the crime is facing a variety of disputes. Starting with the basic situation of the crime of drunken dangerous driving, this paper expounds the background and existing provisions of the crime, and introduces the relevant legislation of the United States, Germany and Taiwan. Then it mainly studies the proof rules of "drunken" behavior in the crime of drunken dangerous driving, and points out the deficiency of the crime in evidence acceptance in our country's current trial practice, and discusses it by means of comparative analysis and empirical analysis. It is considered that the present method of proof in our country is too simple, and the judges only judge the crime and the non-crime according to the test results of the alcohol content in the blood, which violates the criminal law principle of "suspect crime has never been found", which may cause the abuse of punishment. Because the result of blood examination has congenital deficiency, mainly the procedure is not perfect, drunk is not equal to 80 mg / 100 ml, this standard can not completely accurately reflect the drunk state of the actor. Finally, this paper holds that the identification of "drunken" behavior in drunken dangerous driving should be based on the principle of substantive judgment, that is, the comprehensive evaluation and proof of the specific state of "drunken". Through the combination of subjective and objective methods, the drunk driving suspects were tested on the spot sobriety test and blood alcohol content test. The field test was divided into three abilities: consciousness, observation and judgment, operation and control. At the same time, it sets a range of standards for alcohol content in the blood, in which the judicial officers exercise discretion and allow the judge to make a comprehensive decision in the light of the specific circumstances of the case, so that the difference in the execution of the penalty can be avoided. True realization of judicial justice.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】