当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

论我国限制自由刑的保留及完善

发布时间:2018-06-19 21:40

  本文选题:限制自由刑 + 管制 ; 参考:《重庆大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:限制自由刑不同于身体刑、生命刑,也不同于同属于自由刑的剥夺自由刑,受刑人仍然在社会上过着基本正常的日常生活,继续从事原来的职业,保持正常的社会家庭关系,当然他们会受到法律的特殊限制,丧失某些社会待遇。目前,在世界上很多国家的刑事立法中都有限制自由刑的规定,只是名称存在差异。英美称为保护与观察、社会服务令,一些原苏联和东欧国家的刑法则将其规定为不剥夺自由的劳动改造。从刑罚的思想基础来看,限制自由刑与刑罚轻缓化、社会化的趋势密不可分的,它在理论上抛弃了对罪犯进行惩罚、报复的观念,而认为刑罚的最主要目的在于阻止犯罪、预防犯罪和消灭犯罪。鉴于此社会应当对罪犯进行教育、挽救,使其改邪归正、重返社会。自此,限制自由刑应运而生。 为我国所独创且作为我国唯一限制自由刑的管制刑,并不完全剥夺犯罪分子的自由而是将符合条件的服刑人员放在社会中进行教育和改造。管制设立之初对于打击反革命分子及取得解放战争和巩固新生政权起到了重要的作用。但是近代中国尤其是改革开放以来,社会形势发展迅速,,管制刑暴露出来的问题与我国法治建设的要求显得格格不入。正因为如此,学界才会有要废除管制刑的声音,但是管制刑作为一种限制自由刑有其独特的功能和意义,保留并完善管制刑是最正确的选择。 本文将从管制的发展历程、含义、特点、功能、价值及现今司法实践中存在的问题等方面展开论述,提出完善我国管制刑的建议,从而使其更好地发挥自身的效用。
[Abstract]:Restriction of liberty punishment is different from body punishment, life penalty, and deprivation of liberty punishment, which belongs to the same kind of free punishment. Prisoners still lead a basic normal daily life in society, continue to engage in their original professions, and maintain normal social and family relations. Of course, they will be subject to the special restrictions of the law, the loss of certain social treatment. At present, the criminal legislation of many countries in the world has the stipulation of limited free punishment, but the name is different. Britain and the United States called protection and observation, social service orders, some former Soviet and Eastern European countries' criminal law stipulated it as free labor reform. From the view of the ideological basis of penalty, the restriction of free punishment is closely related to the punishment of light and socialized. It abandons the concept of punishment and revenge of criminals in theory, and thinks that the main purpose of punishment is to prevent crime. Crime prevention and elimination In view of this society, criminals should be educated, saved, corrected and reintegrated into society. Since then, the restriction of liberty came into being. As the only restriction of freedom punishment, the control penalty, which was created by our country, does not completely deprive the criminals of their freedom, but puts the qualified prisoners in the society for education and reform. At the beginning of its establishment, it played an important role in fighting the anti-revolutionaries, obtaining the war of liberation and consolidating the new regime. However, in modern China, especially since the reform and opening up, the social situation has developed rapidly, and the problems exposed by the punishment of control are incompatible with the requirements of the construction of the rule of law in our country. Because of this, the academic circles will have the voice to abolish the punishment of control, but as a kind of restriction of freedom punishment has its unique function and significance, it is the most correct choice to retain and perfect the punishment of control. This article will discuss the development course, meaning, characteristic, function, value and problems existing in the current judicial practice of the regulation, and put forward the suggestion of perfecting the control punishment in our country, so as to make it exert its own utility better.
【学位授予单位】:重庆大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.12

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 李峰;;重构管制刑之思考[J];广西社会主义学院学报;2006年01期

2 翟中东;刑罚执行社会化的国际现状与我国的发展趋势[J];江西社会科学;2004年05期

3 王刚;现代社区服务刑罚的价值及其借鉴[J];攀登;2003年05期

4 林蔚文;;从英国社区服务刑思考我国刑罚制度现代化路径[J];厦门特区党校学报;2007年03期

5 曹子丹;;试论我国管制刑存在的根据[J];中国法学;1990年01期

6 王刚;从国外社区服务看我国管制刑的改革[J];杭州商学院学报;2004年02期



本文编号:2041395

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2041395.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户aff59***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com