嫖宿幼女罪非正当性问题研究
发布时间:2018-06-21 07:15
本文选题:嫖宿幼女罪 + 非正当性 ; 参考:《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:摘要:嫖宿幼女罪自1997年入刑以来,争议不断,加之近年来接连发生的性侵幼女犯罪,更是将有关该罪的讨论推向白热化。本文以嫖宿幼女罪的非正当性问题为研究对象,对民众和学界关于嫖宿幼女罪争议的焦点予以探讨,意在指明嫖宿幼女罪的非正当性存在的根本原因,从而达到解决相关争议、弥补缺陷与不足的目的,以求对日后立法完善和司法实践有所助益。 本文共阐述以下四个部分的内容: 第一部分阐述嫖宿幼女罪非正当性问题的开端,亦即嫖宿幼女行为入刑。共分两节:第一节介绍本罪入刑的时代背景,主要围绕着90年代初期颁布的有关遏制卖淫嫖娼活动的法律法规和司法解释进行论述;第二节揭示“严打”政策对嫖宿幼女行为入刑的影响,并进一步引出近年来有关嫖宿幼女罪是否正当的争论焦点——与相关犯罪的刑罚比较。 第二部分重点论述嫖宿幼女罪非正当性问题的争论焦点,亦即与奸淫幼女型强奸罪的刑罚比较。以是否出现加重结果为标准,区分两种情况:通常情况下的刑罚比较;出现加重结果时的刑罚比较。对比两种情况下嫖宿幼女罪与奸淫幼女型强奸罪之间的刑罚差异,,进而得出前罪的刑罚实际重于后罪的结论。 第三部分揭示否定嫖宿幼女罪正当性的根本原因。本部分共分三节:(一)正当性的界定;(二)幼女的“承诺”;(三)伪概念——“卖淫幼女”。通过对这几个方面的论述意在说明,“卖淫幼女”是不可能存在的,只有可能是“被强奸的幼女”,嫖宿幼女罪在逻辑上的悖论所衍生出来的“卖淫幼女”这一伪概念才是其正当性缺位的根源;第四部分旨在解决嫖宿幼女罪非正当性问题。本部分共分两节:第一节主要对“解释完善论”和“废除重构论”两种解决思路进行评述;第二节对嫖宿幼女行为进行重新定位,通过司法解释的方式从实质上排除该罪在司法实践中的适用,将嫖宿幼女行为划入奸淫幼女型强奸罪,当司法实践中发生类似犯罪时,不再以嫖宿幼女罪论处。
[Abstract]:Absrtact: the crime of whoring young girls has been controversial since 1997, and the crime of sexual abuse of young girls has occurred in recent years, which has pushed the discussion of this crime to a boil. In this paper, the author takes the problem of the illegitimacy of the crime of whoring young girls as the research object, discusses the focus of the controversy between the public and the academic circles on the crime of whoring young girls, with a view to pointing out the fundamental reasons for the existence of the illegitimacy of the crime of whoring young girls, so as to resolve the relevant disputes. In order to make up for the defects and deficiencies, it is helpful to perfect the legislation and judicial practice in the future. This paper expounds the contents of the following four parts: the first part expounds the beginning of the illegitimate problem of the crime of whoring young girls, that is, the criminal act of whoring young girls. It is divided into two sections: the first section introduces the background of the crime, mainly around the early 1990s promulgated laws and regulations on the suppression of prostitution and judicial interpretation; The second section reveals the impact of the "severe strike" policy on the punishment of the behavior of whoring young girls, and further leads to the focus of debate on whether the crime of whoring young girls is justified in recent years-compared with the punishment of related crimes. The second part focuses on the debate on the illegality of the crime of whoring young girls, that is, the penalty comparison with the crime of raping young girls. Based on the criterion of whether there is an aggravating result, the author distinguishes between two situations: the comparison of penalties in normal cases and the comparison of penalties in cases of aggravating results. By comparing the penalty difference between the crime of whoring young girl and the crime of raping the young girl, the conclusion that the penalty of the former crime is heavier than the later crime is concluded. The third part reveals the basic reason of denying the legitimacy of the crime of whoring young girls. This part is divided into three sections: (1) the definition of legitimacy (2) the "promise" of the young girl (3) the false concept-"the young girl of prostitution". Through the discussion of these aspects, it is intended to show that "young girls of prostitution" are impossible to exist, only "young girls who have been raped". The false concept of "prostitute" derived from the logical paradox of the crime of whoring young girls is the root of its lack of legitimacy. The fourth part aims to solve the illegitimate problem of the crime of whoring young girls. This part is divided into two sections: the first section mainly comments on the two solutions of "explanation and perfection Theory" and "abolition and Reconstruction Theory", and the second section focuses on the reorientation of the behavior of whoring young girls. By the way of judicial interpretation, this crime is practically excluded from the application of judicial practice, and the behavior of whoring young girls is classified into the crime of raping young girls. When similar crimes occur in judicial practice, the crime of whoring young girls is no longer punished.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵合俊;;嫖宿幼女罪再思考——一种国际公约的视角[J];妇女研究论丛;2011年05期
2 张明楷;;法条竞合中特别关系的确定与处理[J];法学家;2011年01期
3 童德华;;嫖宿幼女行为的法条竞合问题[J];法学;2009年06期
4 吴学斌,王声;论量刑制度中的“从重处罚”[J];中央政法管理干部学院学报;1998年05期
5 刘焱;;嫖宿幼女罪分解归入强奸罪与猥亵儿童罪及立法修订研究[J];妇女研究论丛;2012年05期
6 陈珊珊;;法条竞合时的量刑衡平方法研究——以嫖宿幼女罪与强奸罪间的量刑衡平问题为例[J];法商研究;2012年06期
7 刘明祥;;嫖宿幼女行为适用法条新论[J];法学;2012年12期
8 张荣丽;;“嫖宿幼女罪”存废论——基于儿童优先和非歧视原则的分析[J];妇女研究论丛;2013年01期
9 劳东燕;;强奸罪与嫖宿幼女罪的关系新论[J];清华法学;2011年02期
10 刘杨;;正当性与合法性概念辨析[J];法制与社会发展;2008年03期
本文编号:2047709
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2047709.html