侵占不法原因给付物行为研究

发布时间：2018-06-21 10:08

本文选题：不法原因给付 + 统一性　；参考：《西南科技大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：不法原因给付是指给付方有意识、有目的地给付他人财产,因而发生财产损益变动。而给付者的意识和目的是基于违反强行法规或者公序良俗的给付,同时受领者相对于给付者而言无终局受领给付之法律上原因。该给付之债自始欠缺给付目的,且受领者将该物据为己有,无法律上原因之情形。此时,受领者的行为已构成侵占,但给付者是否享有返还请求权?受领者的侵占行为又是否构成侵占罪?目前,我国法律对该种行为无明确界定,因此常出现民法上不值得保护的利益刑法又加以保护,那么是否违背了法的统一性等问题是现在刑法理论和实践共同面临的一大难题。故本文对该侵占行为进行了深度剖析,从维护社会秩序的角度出发,得出结论认为侵占不法原因给付物的行为是成立我国侵占罪的。
[Abstract]:Illegal reason payment refers to the intentional and purposeful payment of property by the payer, which results in the change of property gains and losses. The consciousness and purpose of the giver is based on the legal reason of violating the law or public order and good custom, and the recipient has no final payment compared with the payer. The debt was not intended for payment, and the recipient took it for his own possession, without legal reasons. At this time, the act of the recipient has constituted encroachment, but does the payer have the right to claim for return? Does the embezzlement of the recipient constitute the crime of embezzlement? At present, the law of our country has no clear definition of this kind of behavior, so the criminal law of interests which is not worth protecting in civil law is often protected, so whether it violates the unity of law or not is a big problem that the theory and practice of criminal law are faced with. Therefore, this paper makes a deep analysis of the encroachment, and from the point of view of maintaining social order, draws a conclusion that the act of encroaching upon the illegal cause of payment is the crime of embezzlement in our country.
【学位授予单位】：西南科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】