突围抽象事实认识错误困境的逻辑进路

发布时间：2018-06-21 14:34

本文选题：形式逻辑 + 共通性构成要件　；参考：《湖北社会科学》2017年03期

【摘要】：现有针对抽象事实认识错误的解决方式存在两大困境:其一,部分解读结果违背人的基本法感情;其二,违背主客观相统一原则。借用形式逻辑,依据是否存在共通性构成要件,可以将抽象事实认识错误划分为同质的不同构成要件错误(真包含关系、真包含于关系、交叉关系)与异质的不同构成要件错误(全异关系)。形式逻辑指导下的构成要件符合说极力寻找共通性构成要件且对认识事实与现实事实之间关系划分得十分清晰,因而可避免出现最终结论违背人的基本法感情。再者,共通性构成要件是认识事实与现实事实相一致的部分,其自身与主客观相统一原则一致,避免了其他学说中构成要件界分功能与解决功能分离带来的尴尬。运用形式逻辑突围抽象事实认识错误困境,具有理论上的自洽性与实践中的合理性。
[Abstract]:There are two dilemmas in the existing solutions to the misunderstanding of abstract facts: first, the result of partial interpretation violates the feelings of the basic law of human beings; second, it violates the principle of unity of subjectivity and objectivity. By using formal logic and according to the existence of common constitutive elements, the errors of abstract fact cognition can be divided into the errors of different constituent elements of homogeneity (true inclusion relation, true inclusion in relation). Cross-relation) and heterogeneity of the different elements of error (all different relations). Under the guidance of formal logic, the constitutive elements are in line with the theory of seeking common elements, and the relationship between cognition and reality can be clearly divided, so that the final conclusion can avoid the feelings of violating the basic Law of human beings. Furthermore, the common constitutive elements are the part of understanding the facts and the reality facts, which is consistent with the principle of the unity of subjective and objective, and avoids the embarrassment caused by the separation of the function of the boundary of the constituent elements and the resolution function in other theories. Using formal logic to break through abstract facts to understand the error dilemma has the theoretical self-consistency and the rationality in practice.
【作者单位】：天津财经大学;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“我国刑法修正的理论模型与制度实践研究”(16ZDA061)之第四子课题“刑法修正视野下的刑法改革与制度实践研究”的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】