被害人自我答责在刑事责任分配中的运用

发布时间：2018-06-22 23:22

  本文选题：被害人自我答责 + 刑事责任分配　； 参考：《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年02期

【摘要】：主张被害人自我答责是一种"完全否定或者完全肯定"的判断,判定责任时只能将责任归属于行为人或者被害人一方,不存在同时归属责任的情况。在被害人心智健全的情况下,如果参与者对其意思形成的妨碍,从社会通念看来并不足以影响其自己我决定的,即使被害人遭受损害也不得归咎于参与者。保证义务原则上排除被害人自我答责的适用,但在特殊情况下,特定义务人如果出于促进被害人福祉的目的参与了被害人的自我危殆行为,从法益衡量、动机评判和参与形态上综合考虑,依然有适用被害人自我答责的余地。
[Abstract]:The author holds that the victim's self-responsibilityis a kind of judgment which is "totally negated or affirmed". When judging the responsibility, the responsibility can only be attributed to the actor or the party of the victim, and there is no case of simultaneous attribution of the responsibility. In the case of the mental integrity of the victim, if the participant hinders the formation of his intention, it is not sufficient from the social perspective to influence his or her own decision, and even the victim may not be imputed to the participant. The obligation of guarantee excludes in principle the application of the victim's self-responsibility.However, in special circumstances, if the specific obligor participates in the victim's self-critical behavior for the purpose of promoting the welfare of the victim, it is measured from the benefit of law. There is still room for the victim's self-responsibility to be applied to the comprehensive consideration of motivation evaluation and participation form.
【作者单位】： 厦门大学法学院;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“刑事立法的进展与实证研究”(2013221033)
【分类号】：D924
，

本文编号：2054660