网络诽谤入罪标准问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-26 00:49

本文选题：网络诽谤 + 入罪标准　；参考：《宁波大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着互联网迅速发展,网络诽谤行为引起人们高度关注。与传统诽谤相比,网络诽谤存在扩散速度快、传播成本低、隐蔽性强、危害性大等特点。为打击网络诽谤,相关司法解释相继出台,对网络诽谤入罪标准进行明确界定,有效地震慑了网络诽谤潜在犯罪主体,但另一方面,对于网络诽谤入罪标准仍存在一些争议,司法实践中也存在一些困境。本文从传统诽谤入罪标准应对网络社会的不适应性展开,对司法解释进行解读,结合案例样本,发现司法实践中主要引用“量化标准”为审判依据,其它入罪标准形同虚设;进而探究原因,从入罪标准合理性、合法性以及实践操作困境进行分析,最终提出应当通过行政处罚程序前置、集团诽谤严厉打击、不同客体区别保护、量化指标辅助考量这四方面对网络诽谤入罪标准进行综合考量,以期为网络诽谤入罪标准的进一步完善提供思路。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the Internet, people pay close attention to the online libel behavior. Compared with traditional libel, Internet libel has the characteristics of fast diffusion, low spreading cost, strong concealment and great harmfulness. In order to combat network libel, relevant judicial explanations have been issued one after another. The standard of network libel is clearly defined and effectively deterred the potential criminal subject of network libel, but on the other hand, there are still some controversies about the standard of network libel incrimination. There are also some dilemmas in judicial practice. Based on the traditional standard of libel incrimination, this paper unfolds the inadaptability of the network society, interprets the judicial interpretation, and combines with the sample of the case, finds out that in judicial practice, the "quantitative standard" is mainly cited as the basis of the trial, and the other standards of incrimination are virtually empty. Then it explores the reasons, analyzes the rationality of the standard of incrimination, legitimacy and practical operation dilemma, and finally puts forward that we should put forward the administrative punishment procedure, crack down on defamation of groups, and protect different objects differently. The quantitative index is used to consider the four aspects of the online libel criminalization standards in order to provide ideas for the further improvement of the Internet libel criminalization standards.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】