虚拟财产犯罪的教义学展开

发布时间：2018-06-26 09:53

本文选题：虚拟财产 + 公私财物　；参考：《法学家》2017年04期

【摘要】：作为财产性利益的下位形式,虚拟财产属于刑法意义上的公私财物,但侵害虚拟财产的行为并不一定符合现行刑法所规定的财产罪构成要件。对于虚拟财产侵害行为的讨论,不应将焦点集中于财物概念一隅,而应当重视审查具体行为方式的构成要件该当性。转移他人账户内的虚拟财产是互联网世界典型的财产侵害方式,但无法根据现有的盗窃罪或诈骗罪构成要件进行评价。盗窃罪的处理进路以占有概念的观念化为基础,牺牲了盗窃罪构成要件的定型性;诈骗罪的处理进路试图以预设同意理论回避机器不能被骗的法理,却存在体系上的错置。以非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪处理的实践做法只是现行法语境下的权宜之计,未能对财产侵害这一不法内涵进行全面评价。立法上,针对数据不当使用致他人财产损害的行为有必要增设专门的构成要件予以规制。解释上,传统的财产犯罪仍能在一定限度内妥善处理其他类型的虚拟财产侵害行为。
[Abstract]:As the inferior form of property interests, virtual property belongs to the public and private property in the sense of criminal law, but the behavior of infringing virtual property does not necessarily accord with the constitutive requirements of property crime stipulated in the current criminal law. The discussion of virtual property infringement should not focus on the concept of property, but should pay attention to examine the constitutive elements of specific behavior. The transfer of virtual property in other people's accounts is a typical form of property infringement in the Internet world, but it cannot be evaluated according to the existing constitutive elements of theft or fraud. The way to deal with larceny is based on the concept of possession, and the formality of the constitutive elements of the crime of larceny is sacrificed, while the treatment of fraud attempts to avoid the legal principle that the machine cannot be deceived with the theory of presupposition consent, but there is a systematic misplacement. The practice of dealing with the crime of illegally obtaining data from computer information system is only an expedient measure in the context of current law and fails to comprehensively evaluate the illegal connotation of property infringement. In legislation, it is necessary to set up special constitutive elements to regulate the improper use of data to cause property damage to others. In explanation, the traditional property crime can deal with other kinds of virtual property infringement properly within certain limits.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;南京大学中德法学研究所;
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】