不纯正不作为犯作为义务来源新探
发布时间:2018-06-26 12:43
本文选题:形式作为义务来源 + 实质作为义务来源 ; 参考:《华南理工大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:法调整人的行为,而人的行为又可分为作为与不作为,所以法不仅调整人的作为,而且也调整人的不作为。不作为是相对于作为而言的,是指行为人负有实施某种积极行为的特定的法律义务,并且能够实行而不去实行的行为。与作为不同,,不作为经常是行为人身体上呈现出静止的状态,所以对此类犯罪的研究更加复杂。在行为人构成不作为犯罪的条件中,最关键的是判定某作为义务是否属于不作为犯罪的作为义务来源。现在众多司法实践中的疑难案件的争议焦点也在于此。一方面,我国刑法中没有相关规定,但司法实践却此类行为进行了定罪处罚,这是立法与司法之间的矛盾;另一方面,我国刑法理论一直是以作为犯为中心,对不纯正不作为犯的作为义务研究不深,所以在司法实践中的难题就是怎样统一不纯正不作为犯的处罚范围。本文通过案例引入问题,概述不纯正不作为犯的相关情况,对其义务的形式来源说和实质来源说的发展历史及学说进行阐述和中外对比,最终确定适合我国的来源说,将“密切生活共同体说”引进国内,促进司法统一,完善刑事立法。
[Abstract]:Law adjusts human behavior, and human behavior can be divided into acts and omissions, so the law not only adjusts human behavior, but also adjusts human omission. Omission is relative to action, refers to the actor has a specific legal obligation to carry out a certain positive act, and can carry out but not to carry out the act. Different from act, omission often presents a static state of body, so the study of this kind of crime is more complicated. In the condition that the perpetrator constitutes a crime of omission, the most important thing is to determine whether an obligation of action belongs to the source of the obligation of omission. Now the controversial focus of many difficult cases in judicial practice also lies in this. On the one hand, there are no relevant provisions in our criminal law, but in judicial practice, this kind of behavior has been convicted and punished, which is the contradiction between legislation and judicature; on the other hand, the theory of criminal law of our country has always focused on the crime as a crime. There is no deep research on the obligation to act of non-pure omission, so the difficult problem in judicial practice is how to unify the punishment range of innocent omission. This article introduces the problem through the case, summarizes the related situation of the crime of impureness and omission, expounds the development history and theory of the formal source theory and the substantial source theory of its obligation, and makes a comparison between China and foreign countries, and finally determines the source theory suitable for our country. "close living Community" will be introduced into China to promote judicial unity and improve criminal legislation.
【学位授予单位】:华南理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭哲;;对“见死不救”的法理学再思考[J];安徽大学学报;2006年05期
2 刘士心;;不纯正不作为犯罪中先行行为引起的义务研究[J];北方法学;2007年06期
3 李进平;;“见危不救”的刑法治理[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2010年10期
4 曾彦;彭小勇;;论夫妻之间的救助义务及其履行[J];当代经理人;2006年05期
5 苏彩霞;遗弃罪之新诠释[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2001年01期
6 张莉琼;;夫妻间刑法作为义务的法理分析[J];法学评论;2008年02期
7 隋亦可;;不作为犯罪若干问题探析——从“宋福祥故意杀人案”谈对不作为的理解[J];法制与社会;2010年07期
8 李进平;吴晓明;;见危不救犯罪化的理论基础[J];法制与社会;2010年13期
9 尹彦品;;不纯正不作为犯义务来源之界定[J];河北法学;2009年07期
10 李进平;;见危不救犯罪化的法哲学阐释[J];河北法学;2010年03期
本文编号:2070423
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2070423.html