特定关系人受贿罪之研究
发布时间:2018-06-27 19:47
本文选题:特定关系人 + 共同受贿 ; 参考:《西北大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:由于我国正处在较为激剧的社会变革之中,贿赂犯罪也因此发生了“与时俱进”的变化,在近些年查处的大要案贿赂犯罪中,受贿犯罪的手段变得隐蔽化、间接化、智能化,权钱交易的行为由“直接”变得“间接”,特别是职务较高的国家工作人员的受贿犯罪中,一种由情妇(夫)、妻子、兄弟等特定关系人进行利益输送的新型贿赂形式悄然壮大。作为一种特殊的犯罪形态,特定关系人参与共同受贿使得犯罪呈现复杂性和难以控制性,国家工作人员往往会以不知情的说辞来逃避法律的追究,而特定关系人的身份不构成受贿罪的主体,法律又没有关于共同受贿犯罪的相关规定,使得此类犯罪钻法律空子,得不到应有的惩治。基于这种共同受贿的高发态势和打击贿赂犯罪的强烈诉求,2007年7月8日,两高联合以司法解释的形式发布《关于办理受贿案件适用法律若干问题的意见》(以下简称《意见》),对特定关系人参与共同受贿的行为构成受贿罪予以明确,终止了特定关系人参与受贿行为是否构罪、构成何罪的争议。但是,从目前的法律规定和司法实践来看,特定关系人受贿罪仍缺乏系统全面的理解和规定,针对实践中所存在的问题,笔者拟通过借鉴国外的理论,结合我国的实际,对完善特定关系人受贿罪提出些许管窥之见。本文分为五大部分,现分别简述如下:第一部分,对特定关系人受贿罪进行研究的原因、意义,以及笔者研究的思路方法。第二部分,对犯罪的构成要件特定关系人受贿罪的概念进行具体分析。第三部分,结合司法实践,分析两高《意见》在理解和适用上存在的特定关系人的范围界定、认定“第三人”构成共同受贿、共同受贿的主观故意认定、司法实践中处罚量刑等方面的问题。第四部分,针对文章第三部分提出的问题,通过研究国外关于受贿罪的理论得到启示,结合我国的实际情况,从立法的角度提出将“特定关系人”扩大为“第三人”、对共同受贿主观故意适用法律推定的建议。第五部分,针对实践中量刑不均衡的问题,提出对特定关系人在确定刑事责任的基础上从轻处罚,以及规范实践中特定关系人受贿罪量刑的建议。
[Abstract]:As our country is in the process of social transformation, bribery crime has also changed with the times. In the bribery crime of the major case investigated and dealt with in recent years, the means of bribery crime become covert, indirect and intelligent. The behavior of power and money transaction has been changed from "direct" to "indirect", especially in the crime of bribery of state functionaries with higher duties, a new type of bribery form which is carried out by certain related persons such as mistress (husband), wife, brother and so on. As a special form of crime, the participation of certain related persons in the joint bribery makes the crime complex and difficult to control, and the state functionaries often evade the law with uninformed excuses. However, the identity of specific persons does not constitute the subject of bribery, and the law does not have the relevant provisions on the joint bribery crime, which makes this kind of crime take advantage of the law and can not be punished properly. Based on the high incidence of common bribery and the strong demand to combat bribery, on July 8, 2007, In the form of judicial interpretation, the two high schools jointly issued opinions on some issues concerning the applicable Law in dealing with bribery cases (hereinafter referred to as "opinions"), which make it clear that the participation of certain related persons in joint bribery constitutes the crime of accepting bribes. The dispute about whether or not a particular party involved in bribery constitutes a crime is terminated. However, from the current legal provisions and judicial practice, the crime of accepting bribes by specific parties is still lack of systematic and comprehensive understanding and regulation. In view of the problems existing in practice, the author intends to draw lessons from foreign theories and combine the reality of our country. Put forward some views to perfect the crime of accepting bribes. This paper is divided into five parts, which are summarized as follows: the first part, the reasons and significance of the research on the crime of bribery of the specific relationship, as well as the author's research ideas and methods. In the second part, the concept of bribery is analyzed. The third part, in combination with judicial practice, analyzes the definition of the scope of the specific relationship between the two high schools in understanding and application, and concludes that "the third person" constitutes a common bribery, and the subjective intentional determination of the joint bribery. The problems of punishment and sentencing in judicial practice. The fourth part, in view of the question raised in the third part of the article, by studying the theory of bribery crime in foreign countries to get enlightenment, combining the actual situation of our country, from the angle of legislation, it proposes to expand the "specific relation person" to "the third person". The suggestion that the presumption of law should be applied subjectively and intentionally to the joint bribery. In the fifth part, aiming at the problem of unbalanced sentencing in practice, the author puts forward the suggestion of light punishment on the basis of determining the criminal responsibility of the specific relation person, as well as standardizing the sentencing of the bribery crime of the specific relation person in practice.
【学位授予单位】:西北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D924.392
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 顾若瑜;;试论“特定关系人”界定的重要性[J];云南警官学院学报;2008年04期
2 曾亚波;胡杰群;;走近神秘的“特定关系人”[J];先锋队;2012年18期
3 曾亚波;胡杰群;;走近神秘的“特定关系人”[J];法治与社会;2012年07期
4 肖舟;;中国特定关系人受贿第一案[J];廉政w,
本文编号:2075088
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2075088.html