论合同诈骗罪涉案民事合同效力

发布时间：2018-06-29 14:45

本文选题：合同诈骗罪 + 合同　；参考：《广西大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：目前刑民交叉问题是刑法、民法理论研究的边缘地带,正确解决刑民交叉案件具有重要的理论和实践意义。司法实践中合同诈骗罪案件涉及的法律关系错综复杂,却没有明确的法律、法规、司法解释及司法判例可以适用和指导,导致合同诈骗罪中民事合同效力认定在法律适用上的冲突和混乱。理论和实务对合同诈骗罪民事合同效力认定的观点,主要有“无效说”、“可撤销说”、“折中说”和“不予认定说”,以上四种观点对民事合同效力认定侧重的角度不同,从而得出不同的结论。由于没有明确的法律依据和统一的理论研究,司法实践中对合同诈骗罪民事合同效力认定依据评判不一。合同诈骗行为刑事上是合同诈骗犯罪的客观表现形式,民事上应当归于欺诈,是一种行为在刑事和民事不同法律领域评价的两个方面,故关于合同诈骗罪中民事合同效力的认定,本文认为合同并不因行为人的犯罪行为而绝对无效。相反,合同诈骗罪中民事合同效力认定应当遵循“刑民独立”,“刑民并重”,“坚持意思自治”和“着重保护受害人合法民事权益”的准则。在合同本身不触犯法律法规关于合同效力认定规定的情况下,立足上述四项准则对民事合同效力区分对待。本文以《刑法》第224条作为分类参照标准,将合同诈骗罪主要分为主体虚假型、担保虚假型、诱骗型、逃匿型四类,并针对该四类合同诈骗犯罪所涉民事合同效力如何认定的问题进行具体分析探讨。
[Abstract]:At present, the problem of the intersection of criminal and civil law is the marginal area of the theoretical study of criminal law and civil law. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to correctly solve the cross-criminal and civil cases. In judicial practice, the legal relationship involved in the crime of contract fraud is complicated, but there are no clear laws, regulations, judicial interpretations and judicial precedents that can be applied and directed. It leads to the conflict and confusion in the legal application of civil contract validity in the crime of contract fraud. In theory and practice, there are mainly "invalid theory", "revocable theory", "eclectic theory" and "non-cognizance theory" on the determination of the validity of civil contract for the crime of contract fraud. Different conclusions can be drawn. Due to the lack of clear legal basis and unified theoretical research, there are different judgments on the validity of the civil contract of the crime of contract fraud in judicial practice. Contract fraud is an objective form of contract fraud, which should be attributed to fraud in civil affairs. It is two aspects of the evaluation of one kind of behavior in different legal fields of criminal and civil affairs. Therefore, as to the validity of civil contract in the crime of contract fraud, this article holds that the contract is not absolutely invalid because of the criminal behavior of the perpetrator. On the contrary, the validity of civil contract in the crime of contract fraud should follow the standards of "criminal independence", "equal emphasis on criminal law", "upholding autonomy of will" and "emphasizing on the protection of the legitimate civil rights and interests of the victim". In the case that the contract itself does not violate the laws and regulations on the determination of the validity of the contract, the civil contract effectiveness is treated differently on the basis of the above four criteria. Taking Article 224 of the Criminal Law as the criterion of classification, this article divides the crime of contract fraud into four types: the main body false type, the guarantee false type, the decoy type and the escape type. And the four types of contract fraud involved in the civil contract effectiveness of how to determine the specific analysis and discussion.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3;D923.6

【参考文献】