受贿犯罪保护法益与刑法第388条的解释

发布时间：2018-06-30 04:00

本文选题：受贿罪 + 斡旋受贿　；参考：《法学研究》2017年01期

【摘要】：受贿犯罪的保护法益应当是国家工作人员职务行为的公正性。据此来理解受贿犯罪,则刑法分则第8章所规定的受贿犯罪不再只是"以权换利",即侵害职务行为不可收买性的犯罪,而是扩展至行为人凭借其职权或者地位形成的便利条件,即影响力,进行利益交易的"影响力交易"犯罪,所侵害的不仅是行为人本人职务行为的公正性,还包括被其利用的其他国家工作人员职务行为的公正性。这种保护法益理解上的转变,使刑法第388条等在立法上具有了存在的理由。同时,行为人并非亲自以权获利,而是利用其他国家工作人员的职务行为间接获利的情况,使第388条受贿罪的主体具有了"类似教唆犯"的构造,从而使其在认定上具有了不同于刑法第385条所规定的一般受贿罪的若干特点。
[Abstract]:The benefit of the protection of bribery crime should be the impartiality of the official behavior of state functionary. In order to understand the crime of bribery, the crime of taking bribes as stipulated in Chapter 8 of the Criminal Law is no longer just a crime of "exchanging power for profit", that is, the crime of infringing on a duty is not a crime of bribing, but extends to the convenient conditions formed by the perpetrator by virtue of his authority or status. That is, influence, the crime of "influence trading", infringes not only the justice of the actor's own duty behavior, but also the impartiality of the official behavior of other national staff members who are used by him. This change in the understanding of the interests of the protection law, such as the provisions of the Criminal Law 388 in the legislation has a reason for existence. At the same time, the perpetrator does not personally take advantage of the right to profit, but makes use of the indirect profit of the official behavior of the other state staff, so that the subject of the crime of accepting bribes in Article 388 has the structure of "similar to the abettor". Thus, it has some characteristics different from the general bribery crime stipulated in Article 385 of the Criminal Law.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.392

【相似文献】